Mike Wooskey @ mike_wooskey @lemmy.thewooskeys.com

Posts

13

Comments

118

Joined

1 yr. ago

Thanks for the suggestion. I'll take a look.

Thanks. https://lemmy.thewooskeys.com/comment/678096

Thanks for the suggestion. I looked at Actual but it seemed very budgwt focused and kind of light on any-other-feature. But I'll take another look

Last year I hadn't see my doctor for more than three years so when i made the wellness exam appointment they told me that normally i would no longer be considered their patient but the doctor remembered me and grandfathered me in. I had to fill out new patient paperwork again but my entire record still existed and i could continue seeing the same doctor.

As you get older, yes. And I'm older. Also, my insurance covers wellnrss exams 100%, so they promote them.

I agree, though it could make for a bridge to help move conversations to Lemmy.

I'm confused as to why this is worth sharing: 9.0 was released over 3 months ago, and 10.0 was released over a week ago (and forgejo said that 9.0 isn't event supported since 10.0 was released).

But you make a good point: not every benefit to an individual necessarily also benefits society. I just think the framework of individuals being able to decide for themselves (i.e., voluntaryism) does benefit society.

I disagree. I believe voluntaryism (essentially the non-aggression principle) would make the world better, and that must include every person. Perhaps a lot of how a billionaire acts would also need to change to fall within voluntaryism - it depends on the individual person. But regardless, I think that within a voluntary framework if someone wanted to kill themselves, they should have that right - and that would benefit society as a whole.

I agree with yoy, but further: I think that benefits to individuals are benefits to society.

Thanks for this very rational pep talk!

I'll try mega-rebooting to see if I luck into anything.

Thanks. I had indeed found those same results. All are old (i.e., using an older version of ESPHome) and only a couple report the same problem as me, none of which have a solution.

I'll keep looking. In the past, similar ESPHome problems "fixed themselves" once another ESPHome update was released (or sometimes 2 or 3 updates later).

Thanks for the suggestion, https://lemmy-tesseract.thewooskeys.com/u/GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca, but I'm not able to find anything recent about this issue. I found a couple mentioned of this issue and of similar-ish issue from 6 months and a year ago but they're using way older versions of ESPHome and so their solutions don't work for me.

If you can share any of the links you found, I'd appreciate it.

What license are you offering it under?

If I give Obtainium this URL: https://builds.joinpeertube.org/mobile/peertube_mobile_v0.5.1.apk

...it recognizes that it's an apk and shares with AppVerifier as I've configured obtainium to do. But I didn't proceed further because I don't want to install it if it's not authenticl. I need a hash to compare with appveifier.

I want to install it via Obtainium (in GrapheneOS), but I also want to verify the apk first (w/AppVerifier). I don't see a SHA-256 hash on framagit's repo. Is there a way to verify we're getting the correct apk?

Docker Volume Backup?