Not SO or it's methods, I mean the human experience. It can be awkward to be new to it all and to feel the frustration/tunnel vision associated with being stuck on one problem... and then step back and have to dissect your issue, structure your question correctly, etc.
It's just how it is, for exactly the reasons you stated. You can capture every little problem people face in programming, or you can hone in on useful patterns in goals, problems, and solutions, and educate people on how to see these things.
The idea of SO is a little awkward too I think. With something like Wikipedia we're presumably in an academic mindset. Carefully gathering information, sources, structuring it all. And even then people can get turned off by the 'bureaucracy' or nitpicking or whatever.
When people show up at SO they're probably more in a "I can't figure this damn thing out!" mode. We're struggling with a problem, keeping a bunch of junk in our head, patience being tested, but we're still expected to have a bit of academic rigor in our question and discourse.
Yeah but a lot of people don't really know what SO is for. They think you just go there and get help and call it a day. But the entire point is to produce structured questions, discourse, and answers aimed at future readers. Super specific, no-context, or duplicate problems are not useful. If you are not trying to generate useful content, don't go to SO.
Just look at all the people getting frustrated at being told "you should probably do it a different way." They really don't understand that just because they're asking the question, it's not all about them.
She lied about meeting a world leader and had a fake story about it to make her look tough. She's on TV as I write this and she can't even answer any questions about it without dodging. She's such a real character!
I don't understand feeling those things and then choosing to buy a Sony game that requires a Sony account, normalizing and supporting such practices. Giving people money is far more of a normalization tactic.
Some basic questions to train your media literacy:
How many people, exactly, (or less ideally, roughly,) were doing this? (Article provides no answer.)
How often does this normally occur, esp. when it isn't a trendy topic? (Article provides no answer.)
Any similar events to provide context, perhaps give us clues about what to expect? (Article provides no answer.)
Was this a critical mass, or majority, of those present? (Article provides no answer.)
If you ask basic, perfectly reasonable questions, and then read the article, and see that it answers nothing an interested individual is curious about, you get suspicious about what you're reading. "Oh jeez, a thing happened, we have a thing, it involved people." Very cool, very news.
I don't. I prefer the sounds of the newer hybrids over v10s for example.
I meant that we shouldn't have to have so many regulations conducive to tech trickling down to consumers now that that cycle is less of the profit margin. They're making more and more simply from occupying a grid slot, some of that should come back to fans in the form of rules for racing's sake.
My initial thoughts are simply that active aero seems like a thing the pinnacle of motorsport should have. I hope they can make it safe and not eat up cost caps.
The engines being so weak still feels bad though. With each team selfishly guarding their stake and turning a more straightforward profit can't we afford to divorce F1 constructor development a bit from the real world? Like damn man they're going to keep teams out, nerf the sport to make it cheap, make bigger and bigger profits, and everything needs to help their business outside F1? Can't some stuff be about the racing and passion?
No transcript and no video? Doesn't seem like anyone bothered to put it up. I doubt he went on to say two sentences. A bunch of articles all have the same blurb and then have the gall the name the proceeding section: The Context.
I'm just curious to hear what republicans think ought to be done about traitors, election meddlers, etc. considering their leader disgraced former president Trump is traitor №1.
Not SO or it's methods, I mean the human experience. It can be awkward to be new to it all and to feel the frustration/tunnel vision associated with being stuck on one problem... and then step back and have to dissect your issue, structure your question correctly, etc.
It's just how it is, for exactly the reasons you stated. You can capture every little problem people face in programming, or you can hone in on useful patterns in goals, problems, and solutions, and educate people on how to see these things.