mfed1122 @ mfed1122 @discuss.tchncs.de

Posts

2

Comments

68

Joined

4 mo. ago

Yeah this isn't newsworthy because she's rich, tbh there's probably richer immigrant students at Harvard we don't know about. But diplomatically this is a pretty big deal. This lady is gonna grow up to wield substantial political influence in her country, and she likely won't have warm feelings towards America as a result of this.

So then can anything that produces dopamine be addictive? Can I get addicted to hugging my girlfriend, or addicted to reading books, or jogging? Or is there some threshold? Does the intensity per time matter, or just the intensity, or just the time? What about the frequency of exposure? Does any amount of dopamine release make me slightly more addicted to whatever it is, or is there some threshold that needs to be exceeded? Do dopamine-based addictions produce physical withdrawal symptoms, always, never, sometimes? Depending on what? And are physical withdrawal symptoms necessary to constitute addiction or are there different tiers of addiction?

You see what I'm getting at. There's sooo many questions that need to be answered before just saying "this produces lots of dopamine therefore it's addictive and bad and should be limited". While I appreciate and empathize with your sentiment about people cherry-picking the studies they like (sounding like an LLM here lol), it's not as if science doesn't know how to deal with that problem, and it certainly isn't a reason to stop caring about or citing studies at all, or say "well you've got your studies and I've got mine". Just because both sides have studies that give evidence in their favor doesn't mean both sides are equally valid or that it's impossible to reach an informed conclusion one way or the other.

My next biggest question (and what I'm trying to drive at with the semi-rhetorical slew of questions I opened with) would be what makes something an addiction or not? Am I addicted to staying alive, because I'll do anything to stay alive as long as possible? That seems silly to call an addiction, since it doesn't do any harm. And how do we delineate between, say, someone who is addicted to playing with Rubik's Cubes vs. someone who just really likes Rubik's Cubes and has poor self-control? Or what about someone with some other mental quirk, like someone who plays with Rubik's Cubes a lot due to OCD, or maybe an autistic person who plays a lot with Rubik's Cubes out of a special interest? Does the existence of such people mean that "Rubik's Cube Addiction" is a real concern that can happen to anyone who plays with Rubik's Cubes too much? Or perhaps Rubik's cubes are not addictive at all, and it is separate traits driving people to engage with them in a way that appears addictive to others.

I know I've written a long post and asked lots of questions. It's not my intention to "gish gallop" you, just to convey my variety of questions. The Rubik's example is the one thing I'm most curious to hear your thoughts on. (There I go sounding like an LLM again)

I enjoy how every misplaced accusation of something being le AI le SLOP ends up just backfiring against the claim that AI only makes objectively trash things that can always be distinguished from beautiful pure human-made art. If it's plausible that AI could have made this, then it must be plausible for AI to make art as good as humans have. What's even better is it doesn't matter if you can correctly distinguish it 95% of the time. Even just one misclassification is enough to undermine the claim that AI only produces #slop. The sentiment of the claim could even be saved if people were willing to say that just X% of AI art is #slop, but this is unacceptable for the dogmatist's needs, which will only settle for 100%.

If every person who disagrees with you counts as further evidence that you're right, then you're thinking in an unfalsifiable manner, which is the basis for many a flawed conclusion. It doesn't necessarily make you wrong, but you should really make sure to find justifications for your beliefs that are based on falsifiable reasoning instead. That's the best way to know if what you're believing is right or wrong, because you can try to falsify your beliefs in the way that you know them to be falsifiable, and if they still couldn't be falsified, then you can say "Well, I tried to disprove this, and it still passed that test!"

So, let me ask you this, what would, hypothetically, suffice to prove or at least suggest evidence that porn addiction does not exist? If your answer is "nothing", then you're in unfalsifiable territory.

Oh, yeah, I know. My issue is more about the word being reused so much. Whenever I see a word take off memetically like that I feel like it's usually accompanied by a lack of deep thought. Almost like a thought-terminating cliche.

Yeeees although I feel like I'm walking into a trap rn

I'm more sick of hearing "slop slop slop slop slop" than I am of hearing about AI at this point. People sling slop around like it's some sort of brave, heroic, destructive insult, leaving AI users in tears and shambles in its wake. Ironic considering a complaint against AI is that it regurgitates the same characteristic bit of content over and over again mindlessly. But even ChatGPT would have the writing skill to cycle in some other adjectives, my goodness.

Thanks for this counterpoint, that's exactly the sort of thing I think people need to see when thinking about moving (whether emigrating from America or anywhere else) - what's the big problems for people there, what's their equivalent of these problems. Would you mind telling me which party this is so I can do some more research on it?

Yes, I've had this suspicion awhile. Last year an ex-coworkerif mine was quoting the disproportionate crime rate among black people statistics at me and then leveled up into saying Africa is such a desolate place and so only unintelligent people would have stayed there in ancient times, thus meaning there's a selective breeding for unintelligence in that continent. I tried to argue with him about the dubiousness of IQ measures in the first place, let alone IQ heritability, and the deep statistical flaws in the crime rate argument, which don't disentangle race from poverty, but as soon as I tried to make these counterarguments he brushed me off as being "brainwashed" by "lies about equality".

I don't even know what to do about something like that other than just stop talking to the person. What's terrifying is he's otherwise pretty smart, totally fits in with respectable society. Not some stereotypical redneck racist type. I think about that a lot and wonder how many others like him are going totally undetected around me every day.

Yeah, some of that is the impromptu nature of this post. I've thought about moving to other countries since high school. I'm very interested in a lot of cultural things that are just vastly more prevalent and thriving in Europe. Sometimes it feels like I was born in the wrong place. So there are definitely places I'd love to run to. I visited Switzerland and it felt like heaven on Earth compared to my state. I wanted to move there long before Trump's first election. But it seems that particular country is near impossible to move to, plus Swiss German seems particularly tough.

I really like learning about other cultures and such, I'm afraid I may have come off entirely wrong in the brevity and laser-focus of my original post.

Very interesting that you say the working language would be English. That's fantastic news. I definitely think I can get to a basic conversational level with languages pretty quickly, but reaching the technical professional level is my big fear. So that's very encouraging to hear that it may not be so dire as that at least in the Netherlands. Thank you for taking the time to respond!

It certainly seems that way! Some of the ESL speakers I've met from Europe are more articulate than native speakers that I work with. What I most wonder about is the prevalence of English in the workplace. I think I'd feel guilty using English at work in country with its own different official language, unless it was really like, standard even before "the guy from America" joined the team, lol.

My German teacher had a fairly profound impact on my life, I knew him for four years and he was absolutely enamored with everything about Germany. Like the German equivalent of a weeb. Some of that has transferred to me, I like basically every aspect of German culture I'm familiar with, especially the sense of humor. Since I already have some language familiarity, it's always been near the top of my list, until recently with the AfD stuff giving me a bit of a fright. Although I saw they were recently classified as extremists, which was reassuring (thanks Lemmy for being such a good news source!)

It's of course too bad to hear about the rural racism, especially since I'd prefer a rural place of living, but it seems those two things always go together to some extent.

I'm certainly going to enroll in classes for whatever language corresponds to my target country. I really want to be an exemplary citizen of anywhere I go. I feel it's an honor to be accepted for a visa somewhere so I don't want to take that lightly. My biggest concern is just that I won't be that great with the target language despite my best efforts.

Thank you very much for your insights and kind words!

Thanks for understanding, I do feel a bit hurt by some insinuations in some responses, but I understand why citizens of the world would feel unhappy with whiny Americans right now. I just hope it doesn't progress into a hatred. Many of my fellow Americans are very good people, but unfortunately we are so disenfranchised politically - I think it's hard to convey the extent of it. The state of things here isn't a result of laziness and unwillingness to participate. But in fairness, I didn't refine my original post deeply and it came off not quite right. I'm not looking to selfishly abandon ship or become a silent drain on another country. I would love to build community, but it's certainly easier in some places than others, for a wide variety of reasons.

Canada is certainly tempting if only on the basis that I would be closer to my family, and my family closer to me. And the recent election results were very relieving. Weed is legal here too though, haha.

Yes, I've thought about this a lot and do make efforts to improve my environment. But it's disheartening, the vast majority of people in my community are extreme Trump supporters. I know people who threw parties to celebrate the renaming of the Gulf of Mexico. It's hard to know how to improve my community in light of that, and in fact it's hard to even want to.

But I am open to suggestions, what do you think are some of the best things I could do to improve my area?

I deeply agree with the community aspect. I can see how my original post came off as self-centered, but it's always been my vision to be an active contributor to the local and larger communities of wherever I live. I am generally a pro-social person and do my best to help my local community. I definitely agree that building a strong community is vital to the criteria I'm looking for. It's just that my current community feels largely like a lost cause. We certainly have a subculture that is what I'm looking for, but it's just that - a subculture. And while that may be comforting and nice, it's not enough to get politicians to listen.

I try to stave off the harms of capitalism as best I can while also balancing my own happiness for my limited time on Earth. But that's a topic I'm sure we could both write essays about, so maybe best to save that for another time.

Yes, I wouldn't be renouncing U.S citizenship unless I really had to. I've stayed this long precisely because I don't want to leave the "problem spot" and cause it to only have extremists left over living here. I do try to support events and businesses that support causes I agree with, but that's about all there is to do as far as I can see. As I said in other comments, I would truly prefer to fix things here, as I like many things about my life here. But it's starting to feel like I'm complicit in something wrong by remaining a resident and I'm not sure what to do about it.

I would certainly rather fix this one than leave, but it's pretty dismal. There are already large protests, almost nobody is satisfied with how things are, yet nothing changes. Our elected officials don't listen to us, even on the off chance that one I like gets elected in my area. The best I can hope for is that someone will run who will just keep things as bad as they are, nobody ever actually improves things. I've never had an opportunity to vote for a candidate that actually represents my interests. I live in one of the most far right places in the country.

I really would like to fix it here. But I am very unsure as to how. There's lots of community togetherness types of opportunities, but unfortunately having friends with like minds does no good when anyone with power doesn't listen. And now even protesting, no, even just showing up to a political event on "the wrong side" is terrifying because of the effectiveness of mass surveillance and the complete lack of oversight on our police. I am open to specific suggestions on how to fix it.

Yes indeed :( it's a wishlist for sure, not feasible in it's purest form.

People thought "Gulf of America" was just Trump being ridiculous and egotistical, but to me it now seems clear that it was intended to lay the groundwork to ban press like AP. I believe that was a multi-step plan. The administration is not stupid, they're getting everything they want. Everything is working out in their favor. That is not by accident, that is not the result of stupidity.

It's worth pausing and considering what kind of non-stupid, multi-step plan would call for a large accumulation of likely Trump-supporting soldiers with military equipment at Washington D.C.

Is that what this is? Who knows. But I think it's naive to attribute any of these actions to just ego-stroking.