mexicancartel @ mexicancartel @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts

6

Comments

1,422

Joined

2 yr. ago

The big(10mm big) wrench wants you to buy more wrench sockets

I am thinking, that when ionised, electron pressure only holds electrons away but does not prevent nuclear collisions because they are unbounded to electrons. But when not ionised, atoms are being pused together with electron repulsion holding back the nucleus.

I also doubt if the furnace is cold and high pressure, overcoming electron degeneracy pressure causes inverse beta decay and turns the thing into a neutron star? Then you wouldn't get new elements but a pile of neutrons?

In stars, nuclear reactions happen at high temperatures and pressure and at death stage of a massive star(becoming a neutron star), all the electron degeneracy pressure is overcame by gravity and the same inverse beta decay happens and protons and electrons combine to give massive pile of neutrons.

If you think of a bunch of solid atoms(low temp) put in high pressure, why would nucleus react anyway? Nucleus are bound by electrons and are not able to collide with other nucleus in that state. Electrons need to combine into the nucleus with high pressure. For the case of hot plasma, nucleus are able to move through the electrons and react. You don't need to overcome electron degeneracy pressure for that.

(I think i said things that i earlier said i'm not sure about, but this is a bit more thoughtful response while others were sent in a hurry mind)

Power plant🌱

The other two comments saved me ...

What is a VTuber? Is that some form of peertube instance?

I once did. I hated it..

I don't think that's how we should interpret as per english rules though

Atleast it put in correct order

*powerhouses might be better(it sounds better for me)

Error: url1 and url2 are the same

Higher heat also means more violent collisions. It would be much harder to collide nucleus by just pressing it. But yeah maybe with even more pressure it might happen but nuclear reactions usually happen with high speed collisions.

When electrons are bound to nucleus, it may prevent collision by having an additional layer causing degeneracy pressure between two colliding nucleus. That won't happen if electrons are unbounded to nucleus. Atleast that's what i imagine

Even if you assume any frame is valid, you have to pick inertial frames. So even if you travel few days, you will be off from earths orbit into space since earth is in circular motion which is acceletared

For a geometric center you would need a boundary of the universe

Tine machine probably moved in its own inertial reference frame. That will actually get you lost in space because the inertial frame does not orbit around, which involves rotation(rotation is intrinsically non-inertial, i.e accelerating). Time machine's frame will be moving in a straight line if its inertial

Earth frame isn't inertial

Well how is MIT more worse than BSD? Both allows prorpietary right?

I guess to overcome electron degeneracy pressure. Nucleus would collide more easily when electrons are stripped away. Not sure if i am conpletely true though

Its harder but its necessary i guess. For ionisation

That's what einstein said. There is no fixed reference frame, but only relative ones. Every "inertial"(meaning, motion without any external force) frame of reference is equally valid as any other inertial frame movibg with respect to it.

But for sure we can tell earth's orbit is not inertial since circular motion occur, which is due to external force of gravity.

Edit:typo

It may use less aluminum, as the top and bottom surfaces are much thicker