metaStatic @ metaStatic @kbin.earth

“To look at people in capitalist society and conclude that human nature is

---

Read more

Posts

0

Comments

1,812

Joined

1 yr. ago

It's so much worse than the title implies.

Less than four-fifths of Australia’s coal production is emitting 40% more than the reported total of all mines.

and we're still approving NEW mines.

They knew

yeah, I noticed I just said magnets like other permanent magnets could be better or something ...

Thanks for calling me on this.

I was talking about motors and Induction isn't in fact explicitly better. I think they could be if we have no other choice but to throw research at them but for right now there have fairly equal trade offs.

Do not do this!

do you have any idea how long it took me to get down here?

"The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it"

The fact they where supplying foreign militaries in the first place is hilarious.

as far as magnets are concerned there are better designs out there that are not being pursued because neodymium is so much easier.

So much of the modern world is built on what is easiest not what could be better if we put in the least little bit of effort.

damages

Think of all the 78s they didn't sell because of this ...

to take care of my beautiful hair

The Onion staff on suicide watch

anyone else buy the dip? because you know all his criminal friends did.

so his wifi cut out? I mean that was always the joke when playing RTS and some toxic fuck leaves after being bad at the game for way too long. Especially if they actually rage. but the video doesn't show that.

Dude needs to Artosis this hate, set text to speech and let people pay to abuse him ... you know, if he was smart.

I blame the education system

Man, I haven't seen a goat.se in years

Yet another instance of Trump being too small to understand soft power.

is that their taxpayer funded salary? because you can buy one much much cheaper.

I did relate it back to money so you're not wrong but I wasn't really talking about our current incentive structure.

I believe we would reward these people with a cushion against risk no matter the underlying system because that's what we value.

that's not the sort of risk being mitigated by money.

it's more that people in general are heavily loss averse so it's beneficial to incentive people willing to risk loss.

progress is inherently risky. we incentive risk taking behaviour because most people don't actually want to take risks but we do want progress,

the side effect is that any personal pleasure these people get from taking risks is severely dulled by monetary success so they need to keep going bigger until they get so big they're risking the very foundations of their success.

Chop Wood, Carry Water

How could he do the thing he said he was gonna do? who could have possibly seen this coming?

Early Access