Melmi @ melmi @lemmy.blahaj.zone

Posts

1

Comments

246

Joined

2 yr. ago

It's kind of ironic taking a project that's already written in Rust and writing a replacement for it in Java.

Usually things get ported to Rust, not the other way around.

In any% runs, yeah. But they skip through all the dialogue and cutscenes anyway, so it's barely spoilers. Most of the speedrun is just crazy hops and killing Shadowheart to stuff her corpse in a crate.

AGDQ did an actual all acts speedrun, which does show the actual ending of the game though. And admittedly, more spoilery than a usual run because there's a lot of commentary.

"as opposed to" is an idiom that just means "in contrast". You're creating a contrast between what they're actually doing as opposed to what they're supposed to be doing. "As supposed to" doesn't work as a preposition and doesn't actually create a contrast on its own.

No, there may be inequality and bigotry in some solarpunk fiction but unlike cyberpunk it's not about "our heroes fighting the system that will almost inevitably crush them". Solarpunk is innately hopeful, and there's conflict (kinda intrinsic to storytelling) but it doesn't require the existence of inequality or bigotry, and a lot of solarpunk fiction explicitly doesn't have any bigotry in it period.

Cyberpunk might be about "our system sucks, and our heroes may or may not want it to change", but solarpunk is about "the system of the modern day was bad, and so we replaced it entirely". The "punk" part doesn't require that the heroes are individually punks within the context of their own world, it's called punk because it's in contrast to our modern system. Also because -punk is kinda a generic term for genres at this point.

If he actually said "trans people are too sensitive and this is why no one likes you" I'd be right there with you. He didn't say that, though. Maybe that's what it meant, but it's not the read I got. He said that getting offended at him [for making a mistake] was not helping their case.

Yeah, he should have handled it differently, but it's not "trans people are too sensitive and this is why no one likes you", it's "we're in an argument and you're getting upset at me for something I couldn't have known."

Because she didn't just tell him her pronouns, she accused him of misgendering her intentionally, in a discussion where they're already attacking each other back and forth so it easily reads as another attack to someone who's not used to being told pronouns.

And I mean fuck, maybe he's really a monster beneath all of that. But I don't think that what we've been shown is enough to condemn him and know what type of person he is. It certainly isn't enough to condemn an entire instance in my opinion.

Maybe I give people too much credit, but defederation is a big deal and I haven't seen people talking about other instances of transphobia either from this admin or other people on the instance, so it seems like there's a good chance that it's a miscommunication.

A blahaj poster asked about it on /c/mtf.

No, unless there was a different post that was deleted, it looks like a Hexbear user's alt did. https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/7367407

It's her only post, on an account that was created 4 days ago. It's not some grand conspiracy by any means, but calling her a blahaj poster is a stretch.

I see then.

I guess I'm just realizing maybe this safe space is too safe for me. I want someplace that takes transphobia seriously, but I also want to be able to have enough people outside my trans bubble to talk to. I suppose I just draw the line somewhere different.

I guess I don't see the attack? The discussion got heated, but they didn't attack trans people, they used they/them to refer someone whose pronouns they didn't know and then got defensive when they got accused of intentional misgendering. They reacted poorly and worded it badly, so it should be a learning experience for them, but it doesn't mean they're a transphobe.

And the whole Hogwarts Legacy thing is a difference of opinion, not an attack on trans people either. They weren't even defending JKR.

I agree that we don't need to play teacher when someone tries to attack us, but we also don't need to attack anyone who says anything slightly misinformed. There's a middle ground there.

This is a good take. I don't think we should defederate immediately when someone has a bad take once, even if they're an admin.

I think it's important to distinguish that they were not defending JKR, and explicitly condemned her

I don't know how fair that is, because things got just as bad over here when we were federated with Hexbear. They're really active and really argumentative, so slap fights will happen and be hard to moderate.

Maybe things are bad in general over there, but this seems like a pretty poor indicator imo. It's hard to have a respectful discussion when you're being dogpiled by Hexbear users.

I'm not subscribed to any programming.dev communities, but I've seen programming.dev names pop up quite a bit in threads and they've been nothing but respectful.

This alone doesn't seem like something worth defederating over. It seems like they just got baited hard by Hexbear. Did the comment chain get censored? It doesn't seem like there's much active transphobia here, just ignorance of the issues at worst.

From my cursory read, the only thing that reads as actually transphobic to me is when they say "And getting offended by it really isn’t helping your case here." in response to someone getting mad at being referred to as "they", and that itself was due to technical issues and not transphobia.

Frankly, one angry snapback and a slap fight with Hexbear doesn't seem worth defederating over. I'm all for defederating bigots, but I don't want hapless allies getting caught in the crossfire.

There's a difference between defederation policy and ban policy. You could have a server that is very slow to defederate, only defederating for abuse and illegal content that can't be stopped through moderation, while implementing a standard or even fairly aggressive enforcement policy for individuals, both local users as well as remote users. The idea is that you ban offending users, while only defederating when the instance itself is the problem.

Defederation splits the network apart. Trying to make defederation a last resort doesn't necessarily mean one is a freeze peach instance. Defederation policy is an entirely different beast from moderation.

That said, my understanding is that Lemmy's moderation tools are pretty lackluster at the moment, and so a big part of the reason that some instances are quick to defederate is that it's difficult to moderate between poor mod tools and small volunteer mod teams. It's easier to just defederate.

I agree though that the freedom of FOSS moreso lies with admins, as they're the ones deploying the software so they can choose how to run their instance, whether that means federating with everyone or just running a completely defederated Lemmy instance with no peer instances.

The ending was decent. It ended right where the book series it's based off of has a 30-year time skip, so it worked out pretty well for them. They have plenty of time to come back to it and still keep continuity with actors too FWIW.

Apple products are an ecosystem. It's not just the physical devices they're selling. It makes sense from a business perspective to keep iMessage on iOS only, because it keeps people in the ecosystem.

I found that so frustrating because among the people being ableist about it, it was just so ridiculously poorly balanced. But people then wanted to defend it and paint anyone who criticized it as ableist. The doc even has a section saying that the combat wheelchair doesn't give any advantage over able-bodied players, that it just allows people to continue adventuring, and that it is cruel to deny disabled folks the opportunity to adventure.

Then they turn around and write upgrades like 1/day dimension door. That's equivalent to a rare magic item, which XGE says sells for 2000-20000gp, being sold exclusively to wheelchair users for 500gp. If that's not an advantage I don't know what is.

I have nothing wrong with the premise of a combat wheelchair, I think it could be cool, it's just poorly made with all the "upgrades".

This is true, but also it's implied in technobabble that replicators operate on a lower "molecular" resolution whereas transporters operate on a quantum scale. I rationalize this as a space saving measure; when you're transporting living organisms, you need perfect precision, and thus a full pattern buffer worth of resolution. This is clearly expensive to store, so much so that it decays over time unless you do something tricky.

Replicators use a lower resolution scan, as you can just reassemble protein molecules into the right shape most of the time. Eddington complains about this issue. (The non-canon TNG technical manual mentions tanks full of protein sludge used for replicators.) Now, is this actually detectable by a human palate? Eh, maybe.

I imagine if you were to beam a plate of non-replicated food though, the full flavor profile wouldn't be lost. It's specifically the low resolution of the replicator tech.

I largely agree with your analysis here. My point was that the way the economy is portrayed is such that we don't get to see much of how it actually works, meaning that a lot of our understanding is speculation based on a handful of lines.

Meanwhile, they're still participating in the aesthetics of commerce within the Federation, and literal commerce beyond its borders. The idea that there's a currency used for trade outside the Federation, but citizens get everything for free within it, is a popular interpretation but it's never actually explicitly stated within the text outside vague mentions of a "Federation credit". It's personally my favorite interpretation, but I think everything's vague and in the background enough that I can see how people can walk away with different interpretations. Just look at that Ex Astris Scientia article; I even disagree with where some of the evidence should fall on whether it's pro- or contra- money.

The wildcard here is that we see Federation worlds that seem to still use money, namely the Bolians who are members of the Federation, but the Bank of Bolias is a major financial institution.

The interesting thing to me is that people often assert that replicators are the reason that money doesn't exist in the Federation, but that's simply not the case; it's established in VOY that money "went the way of the dinosaur" in the late 22nd century, prior to the invention of the replicator over a century later. Neither replicators nor money existed in Kirk's era. It seems that replicators are not essential to eliminating money in the Trek universe, although I'm sure they're a boon to the standards of living.

The show is also about a space navy that has near total autonomy on the frontier, securing the interests of the Federation while inducting new worlds into its ranks, with our heroes being the Good Guys who are high ranking officers in the military who give orders and investigate conspiracies and hold life and death in their hands as they fly around their heavily-armed "totally not a warship" exploration vessels.

It's very Space America, and at times almost libertarian in its politics and non-interference. It's not even explicitly socialist, all we know is that they don't use money, except when they do. The writing is sort of fuzzy on the matter, which results (regardless of the intention) in an economy that doesn't actually seem that different to our modern day in practice. There's no money, but people still own businesses and talk about buying stuff, which allows for the economic system to fade into a sort of forgettable background space.

Besides, Star Trek isn't necessarily about a socialist future. It's about a post-scarcity future. I think that's a key difference. I've spoken to many conservative fans who say that they believe that capitalism is the only way that we can achieve a post-scarcity future, i.e. invent replicators. Because Trek isn't about a worker's revolution, it's about the slow progression of technology, followed by a nuclear war, and then at some point they just sort of got rid of money because it was obsolete. All we even know about it is from one-off lines.

There's a bunch of info on the economy of the Federation in this article on Ex Astris Scientia.

It makes me think of the Culture series, another sci-fi universe I'm fond of. It's even more leftist-coded than Star Trek, yet somehow Elon Musk is a fan of it and names his rockets after ships from the books. Apparently Jeff Bezos is a fan too. Ugh. And as a result, a lot of people's first introductions to the series is through these awful people, since it's a lot more niche than Trek.