meeeeetch @ meeeeetch @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

276

Joined

2 yr. ago

If there’s not room for center-right former Republicans in today’s Democratic Party...

My man, there was room for hard-right current Republicans Liz Cheney and Dick Cheney. You know what their support brought to the ticket last November? Two votes in Wyoming.

How did the company named after the thing Sauron used to communicate with/spy on Saruman lose its moral compass?

The VC guys who radicalized themselves in group chats with Humpty Dumpty, Peter Thiel, and Curtis Yarvin have come to like him.

But it's because over the last decade or so their libertarianism curdled into fascism.

Will removing him as CEO really matter? As long as he's as heavily invested in the company as he is, its gains are his gains.

VP is required to be eligible to become president, so he'd have to become VP two years and one day into a later president's term. Assuming that we're letting constitutionality get in his way.

Well, they both increase at a rate of one day per day, so they're kind of parallel lines, but since Trump said once day and Vova said three, I guess they can kind of cross after two or three years.

the war he promised to end in 24 hours... 93 days ago.

Pretty embarrassing, but still better than day 1155 of a three day operation.

Considering the now multiple cases of LLMs citing non-existent case law, I thought we already were. Seems like using the "there are only two R's in strawberry" machine to do your job would potentially be grounds for losing your professional license.

His qualification was "on the TV", so it's what this particular warrior needs.

New chapter for Art of the Deal just dropped. Peace in our Time, ghostwritten by Neville Chamberlain.

Human trafficking is probably the more promising direction.

If it's under a certain dollar amount and not to be sold, sure, but this is probably not going to practical for a lot of things unless you're pretty close to the border.

That's not Booker. Also the house doesn't do filibusters, it operates on straight majorities.

Shrinking their market share is a much bigger middle finger. If you use their product and shut off a bunch of features, you're still using the rest of their product and its other features.

Without due process, we will never know. But I'd say we have to presume their innocence, since their guilt was never proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Might never see courage from Congress, but you might see some van Spronsen/Mangioni(allegedly)-esque recklessness from certain corners of the population.

Probably intending to mean intellectual property (Customs is their middle name, after all), but considering the shit they get up to as an institution, yikes.

Dog whistle? Or fog horn?

Two States Declared Themselves Bird-Flu Free. But What Does That Really Mean?

It means the Smash the Sparrows campaign was a huge success that will have no possible unintended consequences.

...those who foolishly sought power by riding the back of the tiger ended up inside.