meco03211 @ meco03211 @lemmy.world

Posts

3

Comments

1,561

Joined

2 yr. ago

So you don't understand metaphors. Got it.

That's like saying black and white is binary while everything is in grayscale.

Cloud you spread mine along a florescent bulb and let me deep throat it? Gotta get the light involved too.

Physically impossible to open the door in a fashion it was meant to be. Airplane doors are designed to open inwards. The air pressure inside the plane pushed the door into place evenly over the entire surface. Given an approximate pressure differential of 8psi spread across a minimum 24x48" airplane for would be 10,752 pounds of force that would need to be overcome to open the door. There is no way to apply that kind of force from inside the plane that wouldn't catastrophically damage the door prior to opening. You can't just pull the handle that hard without it breaking. There'd be nothing to grab that would pull out in without failure.

So maybe you could rig up a machine to break a portion of the door and create a hole. But the door would in no way be intact or functional afterwards.

They must have had a way to get in the first time, for instance.

Not necessarily. There are lots of comparisons to submarines but it's more comparable to airplanes. Part of the security on a plane is that it is physically impossible to open the door while the plane is flying. The pressure difference between the pressurized inside and thin air outside would require superhuman force to open.

In a similar vein, when the ISS was constructed it wasn't initially pressurized. This would make opening the door from the outside trivial from a pressurization standpoint. As long as the only means to pressurize it could be triggered from inside, there'd be no way it would be pressurized without someone inside.

What do they need to file suit for? The session was adjourned. No business could happen. It holds as much sway as if I waltzed into the chambers and held a vote declaring myself speaker. They should ignore it until a proper vote can happen.

Nothing a little reprogramming can't fix.

Good gods! Already? Could they not have prepped us for this with an announcement like last month?

He's ambulatory giving the appearance of life. Unclear if that's real or his soulless animated carcass is being driven by pure hate and ignorance.

I feel like that should be "will have shat"

Best I can do is unceremoniously flop your limp corpse on the pile and sprinkle a little lye on it.

I have add and take adderall. My alarm is set for 7 and 8. At 7, I get up, take my meds (more than just adderall), let the dogs out, and feed them. I do all this trying to stay as "asleep" as possible and go right back down to nap until 8. By then the adderall has started to kick in and I literally can't stay asleep.

Had a similar experience at a job. One source of resistance I found was engineers knowing upper management had absolutely no stomach for the type of change that the company desperately needed. This would lead to them likely not implementing anything meaningful. So rather than waste their time helping me and getting on board with the changes, they just kept churning out the same trash and questioned why I hadn't made all their lives better.

Everyone wants change so long as they don't have to be the ones to change.

They've offered ALL their thoughts and prayers! How much more can you expect from these saints!?

/s

He's also been known to associate with the hacker known as 4chan.

"And I don't want it to work on anyone else's backyard neither!" - American GOP

That's not how that's pronounced in Greek. It's just like Kai in Cobra Kai. Or the first syllable of the name Kyle.

We live in a snowy area and during the winter we can have an entire month just not produce.

Not this one?

So your original comment is false technically. You said they are the worst "per accident". The study you linked only looked at accidents with at least 1 fatality. That would ignore any accidents that might have resulted in a fatality, but due to the safety of the car, there were only injuries with no death. Granted that applies to the other cars as well, but at least something to note.

Also there's this quote from the article that contradicts your assertion.

“Most of these vehicles received excellent safety ratings, performing well in crash tests at the IIHS and NHTSA, so it’s not a vehicle design issue,”

The design of Tesla's should not take a hit like this because the drivers suck.