mateomaui @ mateomaui @reddthat.com

Posts

41

Comments

2,025

Joined

2 yr. ago

Noted: more whining from the idiot.

If your dumb ass hadn’t changed the content of the post, it may have not been deleted.

But you did do that, specifically to ridicule the responses you didn’t like, and it was therefore likely judged by a mod to be nothing but trash and deleted. You did that to yourself.

edit: and then you post this and level criticism at the mods, so you are extremely dumb. Don’t be surprised if you’re blocked from posting entirely.

You don’t seem to have actually read anything. I have taken such good care of this cat that my vets are amazed he’s lived this long, much less suddenly doing so much better than he was before. Your opinion is trash.

Feel free to block me, you didn’t have to offer your opinion to begin with. One less asshole replying to me like they know everything.

Sure, if I’m considered a bad owner despite all my efforts to take care of him well, may as well lean into it. And these birds actually are destroying the crops, so if he doesn’t eat them, we’ll probably start shooting them. And as mentioned in a different reply, none of them here are native, they’re all invasives. So be happy about it. Or don’t. Whatever.

And, again, as mentioned elsewhere, the likelihood this old cat will actually catch any bird is severely low.

Yes, and him being outdoors when he wants is part of that change. There were no issues with the previous residence. If anything there are problems with the new residence. The vets and I went through everything for years and nothing came up that could be addressed. We have this under control, the decision is made. The cat is still going to be outside when he wants, and after all this I will now encourage him to try to catch the fucking birds destroying fruit on the orchard trees.

You asked for answers, you received many in-depth intelligent responses from numerous people, then edited your post down just to ridicule those answers. It’s all on you, bud.

LOL, take your own advice.

Not in the way you presented. See? You’re still arguing about it.

And this was my final reply on it

edit:

who’s name you removed

I didn’t remove anything, idiot. Your post was deleted and I only have access to replies I sent and received. Learn how lemmy works.

Also, it’s “whose”.

Damn you are stupid.

You went on and on about this, and it wasn’t remotely what he said.

LOL, we have the receipts even though your post was deleted. Go back to church, you’ll be safer there.

broad of thought

Yet somehow unable to understand the difference between people ignorant of undiscovered facts making up theories to explain things (or “pulling it out of their asses”), and being dumb.

Makes sense, it was stupid. If not at first, certainly after you edited it.

LOL, ok, sure thing.

He didn’t say they were dumb, he described a situation where people ignorant of facts that hadn’t been discovered by science yet had to do their best by making up something that makes enough sense. Which is totally pulling it out of your ass, ie coming up with a theory, which could be completely wrong. Which we don’t have to do when we have more information to work with.

If you don’t understand this, then you are dumb.

edit: seriously, the best experts in deep space studies are totally pulling things out of their asses right now to fill in things they don’t understand, until they get more data. It’s not like this is unusual.

Sure, this post no longer belongs in this community, it is definitely stupid now.

That’s not what he said, that was your interpretation, which ironically is a great example of being wrong.

“Brave defenders of the truth.”

Says the guy who edited his post down to barely nothing but an insult.

Based on the contents of this thread, you aren’t aware enough of fallacy to speak like an authority on it.

Lacking information and drawing a wrong conclusion is just ignorance. Being presented with evidence that contradicts your self-spun interpretation, and refusing to acknowledge or consider that you’re wrong is being dumb.

Stick the examples I offered.

No. You can accept my response as an example of groupthink being completely wrong.

Even more so, that they cannot refer to themselves as such, much less a student.