massacre @ massacre @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

269

Joined

2 yr. ago

If you are a cis-het white who at least publicly proclaims belief in Jesus, you should be fine. For eveyone else, they'll start with those who have the least power and keep coming for the next out-group on the ladder.... and they'll use anyone they can convince along the ladder to kick off those on a lower rung.

Let's see, illegal immigrants, homeless, drug addicts, trans, gay, muslim, atheist, brown, jewish - appologies if sure if I left anyone out. You may disagree with the order, but I might not be far off.

Come at me with my OS/2 Warp system, bitches!

Truly, email is (thankfully) mostly unspoiled as a protocol since it's beginning. Other than minor improvements and additions like HTML and spam filters and the like, anyone can host an email service and interface with anyone else on the Internet with the same protocol.

Imagine having $700 million, having almost no responsibility, and still being that much of a putz.

100%.

F-that! Take pride... Mint is ridiculously good. Well managed, stable, "just works" and yet has all the capabilities you want, including auto-running near the edge for current kernels (backed down to stable) without doing jack. You can run at the bleeding edge if you want to manage it yourself.

And for any haters - here's my take: I've been working with Unix for 30+ years, I installed Slackware off of floppies when 16MB of RAM was god-like. I have built, compiled and managed nearly every distro at some point certainly the upstream giants. I've been there for the birth of all of them. I've also professionally worked on AIX, SunOS/Solaris, HPUX. Yes there's a lot of fun in maintaining and running things to your satisfaction, but when you hit a certain inflection point of balancing your real life and maintaining distros across multiple machines and decide "This is the way" - Mint just fits the bill on so many levels.

Mint is the bomb and I'm done pretending. Fight me (not you, OP, you're cool)

We need someone to ask him how he'd like to die like that boat electricution vs. shark question: "How would you rather die? Drink bleach or inject it?"

Am in Illinois today. Can confirm, nothing destroyed and certainly not disintegrated.

I'll just leave this here...

https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2023-06-28/trump-believe-me-i-was-lying

If you're going to repeat russian propaganda - it's TWO fucking candidates blind to genocide and the one who is now the first ever US President convicted of a felony has repeatedly made comments that he wouldn't even hold back on Gaza and likely would accelerate it to "finish the job". Biden is no fucking hero here, but Trump is objectively worse on Israel-Palestine if you are a single issue voter. And Isreal-Palestine generally doesn't break the top 5 for single issue voters in the US, so please... please... stop with this.

then shalt thou count to three...

The rare Office Space paraphrase joke. I can only assume the downvotes haven't got a clue. NICE.

No offense, but then "happening" would have been more appropriate. The other commenter is correct about "happened" being past tense as in... it's over. Or you could have used "has happened" which leaves a bit of room for future violence. But this is pedantry at it's best - you're intent having been acknowledged. :)

I remember how frequent "legislating from the bench" came up on the news - Is the GOP up in arms about this one?

[Insert "The What?"] meme here

Not an excuse... but unironically this is why so many rural States are Red. Lack of opportunity and the only hope is in religion. Addressing very real existential erosion of their livelihoods and economic fears would go a long way toward avoiding a civil war. Which another Trump presidency might just bring about...to the Russian's joy, having set the wheels in motion decades ago.

Except you did reply to this. With ad hominem attacks of being emotional and annoying. Instead of with any kind of counter argument. All supposedly because I used some caps for emphasis. lol

Show us the facts - I don't care about opinions (including my own). But.. here's some info for you. Perhaps I can change your position...

• https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/what-is-the-anthropocene.html
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Anthropocene_Extinction
• https://ieefa.org/resources/gross-under-reporting-fugitive-methane-emissions-has-big-implications-industry
• https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/us-natural-gas-pipeline-accidents-pose-big-unreported-climate-threat-2024-03-08/
• https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/methane-emissions-from-energy-production-are-massively-undercounted/
• https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2022/06/08/oil-gas-methane-house-science-permian/

No? Still think regulating this is an overreach? I'm not even saying we can magically get to net-zero carbon immediately. I use NG for heat and gasoline in my vehicle. I'm no hypocrite - I am making investments in efficiency and will eventually be all electric with a large solar setup. This takes time and money and not everyone can do that. Oil and Gas have their place in the transition to renewable power.

We must regulate an industry that we continue to prop up with 100s of billions in subsidies and which get super special treatment by our lawmakers due to outsized lobbying and coushy jobs waiting in the wings for enablers after leaving government. On its face, the regulation proposed looks to correct for decades of (self) under-reported emissions. They're being asked to play fairly. But listen, if you can show where those regulations are "poorly designed" I'll most certainly read it if it comes from a neutral 3rd party who isn't paid by the NG companies or their lobbying proxies. Like I said above, the climate town video actually does a great job explaining - certainly better than I have. So there - is it that you won't respond or that you can't?

In all seriousness - can we crowd fund this purchase and make it immediately public?

Vastly overestimate? You mean against their self-reported and self-serving emissions monitoring numbers? What a crock. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2oL4SFwkkw has a very well researched (and entertaining for this sort of topic) video. You show us all this "legitimate proof" of actual real-world emissions and we'll see who funded it and when. Oh, and it better be current because we have satellite emissions tracking of the entire world which show JUST how full of shit industry numbers have been. Methane is 80x worse as a greeenhouse case than carbon dioxide. We're leaking it globally at MASSIVE rates. We should be making it so expensive to have emissions that every petro company on the planet seals those leaks. At least when it's burnt it's mostly CO or CO2 and H20 emissions.

Go ahead - let's see who is defining the "real-world data" estimates, who funds that research, and maybe then I'll consider believing the "softening" paragraph at the end that this is somehow just a thoughtless over-reach because the current administration couldn't afford to wait. This isn;'t government overreach, this is a planet dying from greenhouse effects and in the midst of the anthropocene extinction (i.e. human activity killing species all over). If we don't curtail the petro industry, then WE. ARE. FUCKED.