Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)MA
Posts
0
Comments
268
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • There is a fairly broad spectrum of answers to this. My point was that there is no neat/definitive answer based strictly on production of OVA, external genetalia, Uterous, ovaries, hormonal levels, hair manifestation on the body, etc. I'm not sure what value there is in discussing specifics. If people add "it's my opinion" to a comment, then that's fine - it's an opinion. But when it's pushed as "everyone agrees" or "scientific basis" it gets into very loaded territory.

    Edit: BTW, I'm not accusing you of presenting it as scientific fact. Just trying to cut through to a common ground understanding that anyone can have an opinion on this, but once it's "legal" it becomes exceedingly murky to define outside of opinion.

  • Opinion is a whole other ballgame. Glad to support it as an opinion. And logically that's where this law is going to reside... not in any science. I suppose, upon reflection, that is my underlying message.

  • XX/XY was typo, yes.

    again "not always" is the answer to your last note" we can determine which gametes (egg or sperm) that would be produced, were it the case that everything was functioning. - there are individuals born with both sex organs. My point is that this is all exceeding complex and any simple answer is being used to drive another narrative than science.

  • No? You've just invalidated your own original argument by acknowledging you would add the "born with" despite the fact that I said there are women who were NOT born with the reproductive apparatus organized to support production of the large gamete (ova).

    In other words, your own argument is not self-supporting. So I don't feel I need to elaborate further than the point here is that OP is saying "define biological female" is defeatingly complex and requires assumptions to even proceed, and even then any answer doesn't land in the "definitive" answer you probably want.

  • Many women have their uterus and/or ovaries removed before or during child bearing years due to complications, cancer, etc. So, I'm sure you would change this to say born with to define it. I will say this: not all women are born with this equipment, but are XY on the genotype. I won't even go into the complexities of the genetic side of the house....

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I came to say this. And not flippantly. Each one of these takes a dive into the documentation to resolve. Sometimes they are related and you can solve some issues with one change, but each one is a challenge to be solved.

    OP, focus on Security first, Errors second, and warnings third. Often the warnings are not a huge deal to having an operational nextcloud, but might impact performance or excessive logging for example.

  • In reality I can only see one way to make him pay this... put levies on his golf course in Scottland, but I'm not sure how the governments interoperate for something like that in the UK.

    Otherwise without any mechanism for enforcement, Trump is going to stiff OTHER PEOPLE's Lawyers just like his own...

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • To be fair, up until the early 80's they were not a paper tiger and influenced many governments around the world to bend to their will and expansion of Soviet style "communism". It became an illusion that could no longer be upheld during the late 80's.