markstos @ markstos @lemmy.world

Posts

11

Comments

428

Joined

2 yr. ago

To be fair, infinite storage timelines are sustainable for no service.

I wouldn’t say I hate Manjaro, but I had a bad first experience with it.

They put Material Shell in the default install. The project devs at the time described the project as alpha or beta quality and it was. It had some easy to find bad bugs.

https://github.com/material-shell/material-shell

I trusted Manjaro to but stable software in the default install and they let me down.

This was for a family member and I didn’t up using Ubuntu instead, which has worked fine.

Meh, they already have this job. How many times have you had to go through a text or voice chatbot to get a human already?

Should we complain if these bots actually get more useful and answer our questions faster?

Yes, they will be confidently wrong sometimes. But so are the humans.

I’m not aware that either iOS or Android support this.

I see two options:

1. Apple and Google build requested backdoor access, which I don’t think they want to do.
2. The police get physical access to the phone temporarily to install a hidden app on it. Possibly using an insider.
3. Bad guys buy pre-backdoored phones from cops. See the ANOM story. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/06/fbi-sold-phones-to-organized-crime-and-read-27-million-encrypted-messages/

I have not read the bill but I’ll guess they are legalizing #2.

I’m unfamiliar with evidence to support any sanctioned CIA backdoor.

Pegasus uses exploits which are getting discovered and fixed. In theory, it’s getting harder for that model to work. Apple’s Lockdown mode defends against it for example. Very different from a sanctioned backdoor.

Once the tech is in place it can and will be abused. Also, non-police can find how to access the backdoor.

It’s the first time I’ve seen it and the timing was perfect.

Each project may publish minimum specs. Find what you and add them up. Fediverse instances can require several services and are the most complex thing on your list.

I see it as a feature that Podman containers are run via systemd. This makes their management consistent with the other systemd-managed services. Also, Docker does it own things with logs, while with systemd, the logs are managed in a consistent way as well.

Maybe you missed podman generate systemd? Podman will generate the systemd unit files for you.

For me, the two big benefits of podman are being able to run containers via systemd and improved security by being able to run them rootless.