mariusafa @ mariusafa @lemmy.sdf.org

Posts

0

Comments

479

Joined

2 yr. ago

The rick and morty we really wanted.

The better image

Noooooooooo where are they taking the lil guy

It's just not true. Disipation by convection effect is one of the ways of disipating energy. Dissipation by blackbody radiation is where most of the energy goes.

For example infrared heaters transmits most of it's heat by radiation. Efficient heaters do not use convection mechanisms, well or not only.

Well all things (human) in space have special paint in order to modify their blackbody radiation and maintain a trade off between disipation heat by EM radiation and keeping a temperature that allows semiconductors to work.

The point is that satellites do disipate heat. Convection disipation is the worst disipation of heat. The best disipation of energy (heat) is by radiation. Thats why the thermal blankets look shinny weird, just like the satellites. You would need a realiable source of heat in order to overcome the satellite disipation and saturate the satellite.

With only "The String" (registered trademark) you have the djent

A true doomer

You broke the box

Because Google Chrome setups a good framework from the moment you open it to track, collect data, basically free market your internet life. Companies like to work the less possible using the least money, if Google already gives them all that setup for a fee then it's more profitable than having to pay programmers to track you in other browsers.

So they deliberately are saying to your face: "I only let you use my stuff if you enter as naked as possible". They are not even shy about it.

Someone like this only deserves a spit in the face and a domain ban. Basically. They can fuck off.

Notes: Most of what I said is not exactly all the true. Most companies just reuse webpage code that it's only tested form chromium, so they only let you use that. Because they are lazy AF, they don't care about customers, they only care about money.

This is the most non-credible real shit i've seen in a while. Sudo for windows? What is next? The whole gnutils native on windows? If they do that I'm going to be happy because i could play games that aren't suported on linux but at the same time scraping all the big pile of shit that windows is packaged with.

Like neutered Windows, like droping a huge nuke into Sytstem32 directory and killing every shit.

No more you don have permisions to do this when i'm the only user, plus administrator. Current state it feels like microsoft is lending my computer to me or something.

Well tbh Mac OS is having the same aproach. I've used old macos and nowadays all the things someone wants on an os are hidden in maze like preferences windows and whatever bullshit.

Well how fucked up are his/her commits? Straight blinding matterial + useless?

The Onion vibes

Me no understand, me say bad. No value me want, they bad. If they don't like things that they can't understand probably stoo using internet and technology in general for the good. Go back to the good old rock and stone.

If you read his comments to my comments he states that following "their" (?) standards, the producers have to put much more product in order to """"adjust"""" for the tolerance error of random consumers. Clueless.

That is scientific standards for him, not "their" standards or whatever. Yeah clueless.

Yeah this guy is pure comedy at this point tbh. Are you of the "our standards" team or "their standards" team (very evil, probably eat childs too)

You sound like an angry oldman not wanting to accept reality.

So you want companies to put excess product because you don't know how to measure correctly (or don't have good equipment). Well ask them. For the price of 410g, too? No? And maybe a paycheck supplement too.

I want a lot of things too.

The point is that it isn't false advertising if you don't know how to measure well. Is not a standar or whatever you think it is. It's reality.

Outside the kindergarten where everything seems so simple and easy to understand. In real life you don't have ideal things. You don't have an ideal measuring place.

Sources of error when measuring:

• The material cut tolerance.
• Your house not being perfectly smooth leveled.
• (for electronic scales) RF noise.
• (for electronic scales) Tolerance on electronic components.
• The scale subjection points not perfectly pressed.
• (for electronic scales) discretization error.
• Components degradation.
• Humidity.
• Gas denisty near the scale.
• Gravity fluctuations in the region of measurement.
• Surface of the sample not resting completly in the scale plate. Etc.

And you are ranting about evil and "our" standards or whatever for a 2% error in the measurement? I would expect a 5% error given all that. That scale must be an exceptional good one.

It's not standards it's reality. Why do you think measuring labs are so expensive? Evil companies?

Try measuring your height more than once and see if results change. Hey if they change, you work for the evil companies, and you probably live in our "standards zone".

Our/Yours standards was pure comedy. It's getting better and better.

All that speech does not change that the weighing scales he is using is cheap af and thus the measuring error is high enough. Even if the guys at the company had the best measuring system in the world without error and they packed 410g of pasta, the guy measuring at home with that scale would probably mesure a vaule not equal to the nominal one.

Maybe the scales have measuring errors because they defend evil corporations. "Please scales stop defending evil corporations!!". Dude i hate scales they are so much pro system....

Srry your comment was too funny for me.

Let me introduce you to tolerance in measuring instruments and measuring errors.

Edit: Apparently I'm pro evil companies because I just pointed out that scales (and more importantly non-professional scales) have relatively high error tolerances (+ the measurament method error). Thus the measuring of this pasta and the possible interpretations of it have to take into account that.

I get is more liberal which I understand why. But that means that changes to the software do not need to be shared. Which for normal users it really does not matter. But again we are giving to multi corporations so much in exchange of nothing. When again they don't treat their users the same way.

MIT is a good licence as an idea. In reality, multi corporations are evil AF. The idea of free software in a sense is that free software can get so much better than privative one, eventually forcing privative companies to implement it them self on their programs.

If giving and taking was 1:1 in software community then again, MIT license is perfect. In reality it isn't. For major programs that have a lot of implication on new programs I do not recommend MIT and similar. For feature like projects is totally okay IMO.