marcos @ marcos @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

1,891

Joined

2 yr. ago

I figure the most bang for my buck right now is to set up off-site backups to a cloud provider.

If you don't have the budget for on-premises backup, you almost certainly can't afford to restore the cloud backup if anything goes wrong.

Then I started reading about backing up databases

Go read the instructions for your database in particular. They are completely different from each other. Ignore generic instructions.

now I’m configuring a docker-db-backup container

What is perfectly fine. But I'd first look how this interferes with the budget you talked about earlier and if it wouldn't be better to keep things simpler and put the money on data replication.

Either way, if your budget is low, I'd focus a lot on making sure you have the data when you need to restore, and less on streamlining the restore procedure. (That seems to be the direction you are going, so yeah, I'd say it's good.) Just make sure to test the restore procedure once in a while.

It must be hard to live with an entire planet wishing you die soon.

Just like functional programing is about making state explicit, not making it go away.

Overall, both arms are wrong... so they cancel out or something like that.

You know, violence is absolutely not acceptable until the point where society safety is determined by a dictatorship and the arguments aren't on level of ideas anymore.

...

I suspect the US is beyond that point by now.

First, "they all" didn't so it. Some of them did.

Second, you are the one claiming the motivation for that action. And you are wrong, their motivation isn't to "keep their business competitive despite the US tariffs"... unless of course they also don't know what they are doing. That's because the US tariffs doesn't change the competitiveness of products on their territory, and their tariffs don't change the competitiveness of products on the US territory...

What should be obvious, because the tariffs aren't applied there.

And it still doesn't work. Just "mostly works".

That's a really bad understanding of how economies work. On all levels.

That's the kind of the way Trump thinks.

Stuff made in China? Tariffs!

Unless China considers it important. If so, they'll just not send it.

I imagine it's the terms the EU and UK were talking about yesterday. I also imagine the US would have something about 40% of the remaining 50% (20% of the total).

Good luck, the instances can't just be started in any random order and at their current version their dependency graph is cyclical.

The US and Russia. Both were supposed to guarantee Ukrainian peace...

Goes to show you how much you can trust foreign powers.

That's mostly because too few people use them.

Remember how the Nazis and the Soviet Union made a treat before WWII dividing Poland between them?

liberal

You are the 3rd person to use this word on this page. Each one with a completely different meaning. From "heavily Conservative (US style conservative)" to "lightly socialist".

And yet, nobody used it with a "person that don't want to stop other people doing things that don't impact them" meaning.

Who is going to buy the network connected weapons from the country that is threatening to attack them?

The rainbow is.

And it's very visible on it.

Oh, I've seen this somewhere else!

Has the US government stop responding every other day already?

It's a 90° angle for a reason.

Changing to some random angle may have sense for some theory, but it's not the Furrier transformation.

And no, the waves have 0 width. The widths on the drawing are for illustration purposes.

The EU doesn't want to be at war with Russia.

Russia also should really not want to be at war with the EU, but as you noticed, they don't seem to care much about what they should do. If they fuck around enough, they may find out, but they are betting they won't.

About to?!?

Dude, I have bad news for you.