About the second one... WTF? You'd wish to consult your Catholic traditions from some Catholic authority. Not whatever that is. But the first paragraph is almost normal, stick to it.
Yes, and we know how to treat it (not cure, but we know how to make people not die) since, well, before the times depicted on the game. We have also knew how to avoid most of its infections since... hum, I don't know that one, but Ancient Rome was full of structures made for that, and functional, so some time before them.
Still people didn't use to be able to afford treatment (that is basically drinking large amounts of clean water with salt and sugar, and resting). And it takes a functional government to avoid it.
But how will red Fascists justify their governments if they can't claim the people wanting freedom are evil?
What of course doesn't disagree any bit to what you said. But expect some coordinated and well founded opposition every time you try to claim "left" and "right" are bullshit.
Yahoo brought the company that hosted my email back then when they had plenty of money, and I never had a reason to stop using it.
I also have a gmail, that is completely unusable compared to it. And an email in a domain registered to me. But from those 3, the only one I don't use regularly is the gmail.
There used to be dozens of theaters in a city, each one with a different set of contracts playing a different set of movies. Nowadays there are hundreds of movies in a city, all of them with the same set of contracts playing the same 5 movies.
Yes, everything is too expensive, what means nobody can afford to take a risk. Not the public, not the theaters, not the studios. (You can see people on this thread commenting that they won't.)
There are what? 3 movie studios nowadays? Or are those 2? Either way, you can't expect diversity from that.
If it had a definition, it wouldn't be nonsense, would it?
"Trickle down economics" is a rhetoric instrument by which people try to convince the public that taxing poor people and fiscally spending in rich people will increase the poor people's quality of life.
What the OP said means literally that if mass murdering people is legal, people will inevitably murder whoever makes the law and helps on that mass murdering. (What is not a universal law, but as sociology predictions go, is quite reliable.)
It's not a hard concept to understand. Also, it has a very distant relation to morality or legality.
You might want to check that first source again.
About the second one... WTF? You'd wish to consult your Catholic traditions from some Catholic authority. Not whatever that is. But the first paragraph is almost normal, stick to it.