marauding_gibberish142 @ marauding_gibberish142 @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts

16

Comments

399

Joined

4 mo. ago

The card only needs PCIE Gen 3 X2 == PCIE Gen 4 X1 in terms of bandwidth. I was hoping to fit it into the slot since it meets the bandwidth requirements

How would I do it then? The card doesn't exactly need PCIE gen 3 X4, at the most it needs PCIE Gen 3 X2 == PCIE Gen 4 X1 in terms of bandwidth.

I think PIA is decent for torrenting and Mullvad for privacy

I see. So they're just going to dump similar to Apple. This is slowly going to make it difficult for AOSP devs to change stuff as they need

Does TOR suffer from Sybil attacks? I admit I don't know what that is, I'll have to read about it

You're right but if it's something that sensitive I'd rather use TOR/I2P

Why do we care about their ownership if it's proven that they don't log and let you forward ports?

Ah I thought you meant during signup. I thought they were audited and provided proof that they don't log anything? Is that fake?

Yes, Nym is new. Their mixnet has a lot of similarities with TOR.

What do you mean by "cost of maintaining a server"? I don't think resource requirements are any different from TOR relays or exits.

It is possible in theory but I assumed they weren't lying when they said over 800 nodes exist in their network.

Yeah maybe I should've put Nym as "of interest" rather than giving off the impression that it's at the same level of reputation as Mullvad and IVPN

Over TOR?

Wait don't they take crypto? Just fake your details

Mullvad, IVPN and Nym (not tested with audits yet, do not trust as much as the other two).

For clearnet browsing. PIA, AirVPN and Windscribe for torrenting. Windscribe and PIA are probably good for either but this is my classification, take it as you will

Can you link to their court hearing, specifically where they refused to provide logs?

Also, do they accept crypto?

Hardened Gentoo?

Use the image viewer used by TAILS

I don't mind if people use LGPL or some derivative of GPL. All I want is improvements to the source be published, and MIT simply doesn't enforce that. I have no intention to force companies to publish their code that they have worked on for a long time - doing that never really helps. But I do want them to publish changes they make to already FOSS products so the author and the community can benefit.

Thank you for your work. If people like you were all around us, then I wouldn't mind as much projects using MIT since we would still see contributions. But I doubt there's that many people out there like you. Thank you for contributing to FOSS.

You can seed public torrents with Proton? I thought they did something to curb that a few years back.

What is your opinion on Windscribe and PIA?

MAC is generally more complex than simple Unix permissions. Whether SELinux is more complex than AppArmour is more up to preference in my opinion

Considering I am the operations team, just goes to show how much I have left to learn. I didn't know about the external-dns operator.

Unfortunately, my company is a bit strange with certs and won't let me handle them myself. Something to check out at home I guess.

I agree with you about the LVM. I have been meaning to set up Rook forever but never got around to it. It might still take a while but thanks for the reminder.

Wow. That must have been some work. I don't have these certs myself but I'm looking at the CKA and CKS (or whatever that's called). For sure, I loved our discussion. Thanks for your help.