RTK requires a separate receiver which is located nearby and has a comms link (unlikely for a fast moving attack aircraft) and only reduces the accuracy from meters to cm. Not sure there's much need there.
I loved that they wanted to use Excel because of how battle tested it is. I use a lot of "newer" programming languages and libraries in my work but having something stable and reliable really has its place.
Yeah I mean who doesn't read up to page 630 of the manual and then interpret the lack of automatic 2-sided scanning to mean it won't even do manual 2-sided scanning, despite nearly every scanner on the market supporting that.
It is. There's a feature table in the manual and it's one of the glaring differences between the two. I never even thought to look into the details that closely, and even if it doesn't have the hardware to flip the paper around and scan the back, it should be a simple software feature to add.
For some big stacks I've just got the pair doc_front.pdf and doc_back.pdf and I was thinking about making my own stupid script to interleave the two docs into one.
I spent a bunch of money a few years ago to get the laser(ish) print+scan+telegram+allthethings Brother MFC-L3750CDW. Imagine my rage when I found that this thing has a document feeder but no way to scan both sides of a document stack. Not even with a manual step in their software such as flipping the stack over and running the back sides through. Infuriating and I didn't realize it until about a year later when I suddenly had to scan a ton of stuff. If someone knows of a good workaround, I'd love to hear it.
Yeah make way for the younger generation like Matt gaetz, Lauren boebert, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Ben Shapiro please. Surely once the boomers are gone, our problems are over
This is a Bill Burr bit.