To me it feels like your typical edgy Linux shit made by a kid who thinks he's a super-hacker because he installed Kali Linux on something even though he can't use any of the tools.
Never. I don't even have an account to comment with.
I used to just bookmark the channels I watch and click through those links to catch up when I felt like it. Currently I'm using Freetube which lets me follow channels without actually subscribing or using a Google account.
I'm asking a careful question to know what the other person supported. That doesn't mean I believe nothing else should be done beyond saying "please stop". The US has a terrible history of unilaterally imposing its will on self-governing nations, and however horrid the events in Gaza, I'd like our response not to continue in that tradition.
Fine, but let's look at all of that section of Article VI:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
Bound by oath to support the Constitution, but no religious test required to assume that duty. Ok cool. Your duty as a government official is to the Constitution, not to your religion, and your religion is immaterial -- and this is key -- provided you uphold the Constitution.
Now let's look at the "establishments clause" of the First Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
If you will not uphold the First Amendment's establishments clause, if you are scheming to establish a Christian theocracy, you are not supporting the Constitution. If you are not supporting the Constitution, Article VI in fact disqualifies you from public office.
For that matter, you don't even need the First Amendment to make the point. A theocracy would immediately run afoul of Article VI itself, as it would require officials to adhere to the state's church doctrine.
IF -- big if -- some shitbag CEO had full knowledge and real understanding that he was personally involved in killing the planet and indirectly all life on earth, you can just jump right back to those same defense mechanisms and find he was probably expecting some hail mary science to save the day eventually.
A majority of the users being professionals doesn't mean your hypothetical kids in Ghana aren't using it, or that Indian developers aren't filing good bug reports. You're accusing me of advocating a problematic worldview you've created for me.
If that means "row-level security" like I think it does and you're reporting a bug as an end user, it's ridiculous they'd even expect you to know that. It's not fun but when you're a programmer talking to a user, you need to ask the right questions to get at what you need to know, basically by inference, or by getting steps to reproduce the error yourself. That was not the right question. They fucked up, not you.