Does that number get significantly skewed by the rich?
Ie this metric would treat the king's real disposable income going up by 1 dollar as equal but opposite to a peasant's real disposable income going down by a dollar. I think the data is a good illustration, but the situation is probably worse and has been worse than this graphic suggests.
I'm happy my comment has sparked some thought. You asked a lot of open ended questions and I can't take the time to address them right now I hope you're not disappointed when you learn all i have to say right now is that:
Not every suicide is illogical, and I'm thankful to live in a society that recognizes that, and provides medical assistance in dieing but I don't have enough information to weigh in with more specificity than that.
Professing to be a mormon is a logical decision if your culture is mormon.
Disinterest in pursuing a more empirical world view is not illogical if one would have to damage their relationship with those closest to them in its pursuit.
(Sorry about the pretentiousness of that (and this) sentence, I can't find a more vernacular way of expressing these ideas succinctly).
I don't think that skepticism of IDF statements is antisemitic.
I don't think supporting the idea of a free Palestine is inherently antisemitic.
I think stating that Zionism is genocide is quite inflammatory, and probably anti-semitic (though possibly unintentionally so). Zionism ie the existence of a Jewish state is not inherently genocidal, and to say that it IS is antisemitic, but Israel's support of illegal settlements (what Zionism means to people today) might be genocidal. I can see why people argue about this.
I think that a hospital/school receiving a report of antisemitism by an employee/student should restrict that employee's interaction with the public (and coworkers?) while they figure out what's going on.
I think it was correct to suspend Dr. Ge and that it would be correct to reinstate Dr. Ge.
I'm a feminist and not a Freemason. I wasn't convinced that Freemasonry is misogynistic simply because it excludes women. Ie: I think there are valid reasons to have some gender separated spaces. My understanding is that Freemasonry is a practice intended to 'improve' men (whatever that means to them). I think that's possibly a valid reason for maintaining a gendered space.
However; in preparing to write this comment I learned that Masonry's sister organization (The Order of the Eastern Star), which is open to both men and women, is subordinate to the Masonic lodge. This does strike me as misogynistic.
I'm open to reading thoughtful comments by Masons or more knowledgeable feminists.
I think the idea of it being an alternative power structure is part of it, but their reasoning is that Freemasonry is Deist/Rationalist which is incompatible with the Catholic position that revelation is a source of truth. Anything that elevates Freemasonry inherently undermines Catholic dogma.
Catholics and Masons are welcome to weigh in though, I'm not either.
I don't think I'm in the wrong comment chain, and I think I commented before you clarified re climate change.
Also I've edited one of my comments explaining a really weird auto correct replacement i didn't catch, which may explain why you feel I'm accusing you of things.
You said tire pollution is potentially worse for the environment than tailpipe emissions. That is a wildly irresponsible thing to say. That's what I was objecting to.
There absolutely are people arguing that ICs are better for the environment, as if climate change doesn't affect the environment.
If you're going to buy a new car, don't, but if you're going to buy one anyway, prioritize reducing of ghg emissions.
Edited: changed "euphemistically" to reducing, my fault for not proofreading my auto correct (I use swore typing on my phone so sometimes things go really sideways)
Oh yes, I forgot about how brake dust is burning towns to the ground because of extreme weather and inundating low lying regions with rising sea levels.
Where does it cross the line into contempt of court and where does it cross the line into libel? I think it may be beyond the horizon behind him.