I don't dispute any of that. More housing, modular construction, all great. It's just separate from the issue of this staircase requirement. I don't have any stake in staircases. If building technology makes the requirement obsolete, great. If the fire department is happy with one staircase, great. It just doesn't sound plausible that 6-15% premium for additional staircases is a root cause of the housing crisis, when developer profit opportunity is clearly the greater constraint.
Just going add early now since no one is talking about it yet, this is why nuclear isn't the way over renewables. Because as soon as any country wants a domestic nuclear energy program, the US will have a freebie wildcard to bomb them.
I wonder if it's an early response to the talk of breaking up Google and Chrome. MS gets more people onboarded to Edge and Google still gets your browser level metrics.
It's true, it's still a bit more expensive to build, but the profit motive is removed. Public housing doesn't need to recoup its costs. People need housing, you build housing.
Why San Fransisco developers can't build more housing. They take for granted that new housing needs to be profitable for developers. Public housing should also be in the conversation.
I don't disagree with this, but we have a detached garage and got quoted over $6k to retrench an upgraded line to it. I know he mentioned this condition in the video, but our driveway is so tight it would be an obstacle to put a charger just on the outside of the house.
In the meantime, we started using a regular outlet in the garage with the basic charger that came with our Ioniq and after 2 years have never needed anything more. Never even used a public charger.
To be clear, he only wrote that he regretted posting them. He didn't say they weren't true. The key takeaway here to remember is that Trump is DEFINITELY in the Epstein files.
No, that wasn't quite the metaphor. The metaphor was that this is all nonsense technobabble strung together to almost sound like real language, but none of it means anything. It's not that your idea is novel or confusing, it's that these are barely coherent sentences.
For real though, this whole post is an AI exercise, right?
My first thought was that it would make a cool sci fi story where future generations lose all documented history other than AI-generated slop, and factions war over whose history is correct and/or made-up disagreements.
And then I remembered all the real life wars of religion...
I don't dispute any of that. More housing, modular construction, all great. It's just separate from the issue of this staircase requirement. I don't have any stake in staircases. If building technology makes the requirement obsolete, great. If the fire department is happy with one staircase, great. It just doesn't sound plausible that 6-15% premium for additional staircases is a root cause of the housing crisis, when developer profit opportunity is clearly the greater constraint.