Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)LO
Posts
7
Comments
4,963
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I disagree with only one point there: while America as a political entity is like a crazy crackhead, it's like a very heavily armed crazy crackhead. Treat the prospect of being invaded by the US the same way Ukrainians treated the prospect of being invaded by Russia. Hope for the best but prepare for the worst, because the US military is really good at wrecking whole countries even if it sucks at occupying them.

  • If you wait until you actually need a gun, it's too late. You can't just walk into a gun store and leave with a gun that day. Any by the time the shooting starts, it will probably be impossible for left-leaning people to pass a background check anyway.

    But thanks for calling me a hate-filled idiot. If hating fascists makes me an idiot, then I'm happy to be an idiot.

  • It kind of did. Git changed its default branch name to "main".

    I think switching away from master/slave vocabulary is probably for the best. Getting rid of "master" in other contexts seems dumb to me because master has always had many uses not connected to slavery.

    One that I surprisingly find myself agreeing with is replacing blacklist and whitelist with allow list and deny list, but not because I think using colors is racially insensitive; it's because allow and deny are more clear to people from different cultural backgrounds.

  • It's ok to depend on people being generally competent most of the time. It's not ok to depend on people never making mistakes, nor is it ok to depend on people acting in ways that real human beings don't act. I'm politics, one if there critical failures was depending on politicians to act in good faith, and another was depending on the voters to stay informed and use critical thinking enough to avoid voting for an obvious conman.

    Maybe there's just no truly good system for politics, and the best we can hope for is the least bad option. But we won't even achieve that much if we pretend the US system was created by enlightened demigods. It's a deeply flawed system created by men who had no experience with democracy and who clearly saw themselves as the leaders of a new kind of aristocracy.

    I will give them unqualified credit for one thing, though. The Declaration of Independence and the Preamble to the Constitution are some of the most effective works of propaganda ever created. Saying that all people are fundamentally equal while simultaneously excluding most people from the levers of power was perhaps the greatest con of all time.

  • "We" don't agree to keep it going.

    And once again you are demonstrating that you don't understand the difference between a metaphor and a thought experiment. If you don't think the situation is analogous to the trolley problem, just fucking say that. Trying to create options that don't exist in the original setup isn't clever is creative; it's just a childish way of refusing to deal with the concept being discussed, which in this case is an ethical dilemma.