loics2 @ loics2 @lemm.ee

Posts

1

Comments

60

Joined

2 yr. ago

Damn, you're shilling hard!

I don't want to use my phone for basic features like the offline mode, I'm not always connected to the internet on my laptop, that's it.

I don't care about Apple music, and almost every streaming platform provides some kind of SDK. It doesn't change the fact that I don't have a Linux client, and probably never will (or at least feature-complete) because they partly use Dolby Atmos, which is a closed-source licensed format.

And no, even on paper, tidal's not the better option to support artists. Buy tracks on Bandcamp, buy merch and vinyl directly from artists...

I really wanted to like tidal, but honestly it's not really good. The search sucks, no offline mode on desktop, no official Linux client, an incomplete catalog...

It's not worth it, even if they are the least bad for paying artists.

"pret tier"?

Grooveshark was so cool! But I don't think anything could've saved them, it was full of pirated music available for everyone.

Your first link is based on XUL, which was deprecated because it was wasting resources being unmaintainable and insecure.

Here's a great article about that

Why? It depends on the business model, even RMS says it's ok to make money with open source

That visualization is really cool

Elixir... please I want an Elixir job

And add Syncthing to sync your obsidian vault with all of your devices and you have the perfect solution

Android doesn't use glibc, but Bionic, a C standard library developed by Google. So I don't think this vulnerability affects Android.

Well at this point, don't trust any framework Microsoft pushes. They told everyone UWP was the future for Windows after WPF, then stopped for WinUI and the app SDK...

Teams on Linux is already broken af, we won't even notice we can't open links

We go back to expertsexchange

Zypper

I'm not agreeing with "worse version of Obsidian", but Obsidian with Syncthing works great for p2p synchronisation.

I don't think it's necessarily the job of the developers, the main issue IMO is that there's not enough involvement from other specialists such as designers in open-source communities.

This is not a problem with people, but with UX design.

We don't need a corporation to have usable interfaces. Right now, if you visit join-lemmy.org, the main focus is for people wanting to host an instance, which is only a small part of the advanced user base. The common user won't care about the fact Lemmy is made with rust or that there's a docker image.

I don't think it's only an issue with Lemmy, lots of open-source projects lack user-friendliness and onboarding.

Once the app is open-sourced, I'd happily contribute to stuff like this

Oh nice! I wasn't aware. So my suggestion would be to change the default maybe, if enough people think the same

The problem already exists now, having oauth wouldn't change anything.