logging_strict @ logging_strict @lemmy.ml

Posts

0

Comments

143

Joined

1 yr. ago

then someone with much more talent can step up, rename the plugin, and carry on.

The challenge is choosing the next maintainer user handle.

https://github.com/msftcangoblowm/sphinx-external-toc-strict

Good choice?

then someone with much more talent can step up, rename the plugin, and carry on.

The challenge is choosing the next maintainer user handle.

https://github.com/msftcangoblowm/sphinx-external-toc-strict

did he just out passive aggressive the Japanese?

Wait! So the author bows his head, says hey great guys u win. Watch i complied.

Leans over to the stranger sitting next to him and says, hold my beer.

In the same heartbeat, creates another git acnt, exact same commit history. And carries on. Some other author, totally not the same guy but oddly the same pgp public key announces they've taken over and here are the new urls.

i call that mission accomplished

this comment thread is like fight Money Mcbags and go bankrupt for our entertainment and for the LOLs and feelz good?

Or we can just post the new urls and pretend it's a new maintainer, with the handle lawyerdisappointed

Putin should take a tour of adjacent countries. Dare them to blind.

No adjacent country would declare war by arresting a visiting head of state.

No country became a country by having that level of lack of strategy. Simply does not exist.

These judges also don't live or conduct trade, especially with their neighbors being a global military power.

So these judges lack skin in the game. Asking Mongolia to arrest the leader of a neighboring country is the same as declaring war.

The media screaming they must do it, speaks volumes about their lack of IQ.

A FOSS app for digital payments, must have a company front to sign deals with country retail store chains. Although customer kyc can be avoided, the payments from the front company to retail chains would be thru a corporate structure.

... maybe convenience is the wrong path

The advantages of PoW crypto, over digital (and PoS), it's possible to force between seller and buyer:

• communication with end-to-end encryption
• privacy oriented marketplaces

With the goal of fostering our own private communities. Over time, might spawn a sub-culture, identity, and ultimately people hood.

There was no signs of foul play at Wells Fargo?

Oh! It was the weekend

I hope this is sarcasm

Currently trying to improve a popular Sphinx extension, sphobjinv. Can watch my daily pain here

If anyone is so inclined, please throw some litecoin my way

Li1S1eZzPHBGyc2Lfx93kCohM5qGYGo924

The litecoin will go towards my daily milk tea habit. Elephants work for peanuts, i work for milk tea.

aGPLv3 is a good business model. If companies are using your kit in their closed source projects, they need to pay you

donationware is abandonware. We brand it Apache2.0 or MIT

Not triggered by this emotional outrage bait

it either costs your time or money or both. There is no situation where anything is free.

I'm currently fixing, not mine, repos. I have the skill level to fix other coders design issues. One at a time.

This is costing me time. Not just in doing the work, but all the time leading up to gaining the skillset to be at this level.

Put a price tag on that. (i'm not boasting; actually having to do this grind)

So they are gaslighting to cause you to have doubts. So they are using a psyche which is a symptom of them having unrestricted access to your time and ears

AGPLv3 is not anti-business or anti-money. It's saying if you want to use the code in a closed source project you need to pay the copyright holder

The copyright holder is the original author, not a maintainer or someone who forked a project and renamed it.

That's why the #1 thing mentioned in copyleft licenses is you can't alter the copyright notice and declare yourself the original author

AGPLv3 is a good license to choose. All the other licenses are naive and do not combat closed source projects and the slave worker that keeps our projects unfunded

Exactly. They obviously didn't research licensing enough.

Closed source projects need to pay for licensing. Or they will force you to work for them designing web forms and smartphone apps

Am i wrong?

When is collaboration irrelevant within a large organization? Your company uses Linux which is commendable.

Taking it one step further

Multiple team members being able to work on the same project at the same time

Can/do all your coworkers use git? Even the secretary and janitor?

Darwin enters the conversation, "Ah chem!"

(raises finger) (lowers finger) (moves onto a species that can configure their own network and printer)

China takes alot of crap from Western MSM. But the accusation that it suacks at IT, so much, would consider using WindowsOS is a low blow

Whenever see a Windows box i say, grandma gets a smartphone. Regardless who i'm talking to. Believe it!

govts print infinite money. All of us are working for free. Their fiat is credits for the company store.

If you think funding projects is bad then the response is to support lobbying project owners to put in malware until FOSS is publically funded.

All we have to do is verbally support it. And cheerlead when it occurs. We don't actually have to actively do it. It's a threat which is done in politics all the time.