Skip Navigation

Posts
387
Comments
96
Joined
2 yr. ago

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

With Masseys out of commission, SpaceX may attempt static fire Ships at the launch site

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

Third Time's the Charm? Starship Flight 9

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

SpaceX completes 450th Falcon booster landing during Friday Starlink mission

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

FAA Approves SpaceX Starship Vehicle Return to Flight (May 22)

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

FAA license update brings SpaceX closer to next Starship launch

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

House Democrats seek information from NASA and the Pentagon on Musk conflicts of interest and SpaceX foreign investment

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

As Ship 35 Static Fires, SpaceX has a Fleet of Vehicles Getting Ready for Flight

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

SpaceX launches 23 Starlink satellites on 50th Falcon 9 rocket of 2025

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

SpaceX’s rideshare Bandwagon-3 mission marks the 300th orbital flight from Cape Canaveral’s pad 40

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

SpaceX starts 2025 with Falcon records and Starship problems

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

Is SpaceX Losing It?

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

SpaceX launches national security satellite for NRO on Falcon 9 rocket from Cape Canaveral

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

SpaceX launches 450th Falcon 9 rocket, breaks booster turnaround record on NRO mission

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

SpaceX launches Transporter-13 rideshare mission

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

SpaceX sets new launchpad turnaround record with Saturday sunrise launch

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

SpaceX press on with pre-launch testing while working Ship issue mitigation

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

Falcon 9 launches NASA astrophysics and heliophysics missions

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

What’s behind the recent string of failures and delays at SpaceX?

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

FCC allows a power boost for SpaceX’s direct-to-smartphone service

SpaceX @sh.itjust.works

Falcon 9 booster lost after droneship landing

  • I believe that's from the ship's recent really long static fire which lasted almost a minute!

  • Honestly, yeah. Yesterday's failure was such a bummer. It's understandable, but still a bummer. Gotta go orbital to get anything done too. The good news is, even yesterday's kaboom should only set them back a month or two at most (just my guess).

  • So clean! I love it when we get landing audio.

  • It mostly just depends on how you want your desktop to look. They have screenshots of each on their website. Since it sounds like you have a new laptop, power won't be an issue for you. (If you were trying to run Mint on something with the power of a potato, a lighter DE would be a good idea.) Personally I love how Cinnamon looks and feels. It's pretty simple, but also modern and customizable.

  • The detail is truly amazing. The mobile-friendly website is also awesome. These guys know what's up!

  • Did they upgrade the support tower?

  • I'm guessing you're talking about the election result? That was my first thought as well. However, here's what the author had to say:

    ...it seems unlikely that this document—which has been in the works for more than a year—was unduly influenced by Trump's election. It was prepared by an FAA still under the Biden administration. Rather, the tone of the environmental assessment signals that SpaceX was probably already on a path to complying with federal regulations.

  • Works on Boost for Android!

  • I keep thinking that it must have been half a meter and there was a mistake somewhere, but that's what the source tells us! Insane.

  • I LOVE that already there are enough commercial space missions happening that it's easy to get confused which one is which! The more the merrier imo :)

  • Thanks for sharing the video! I'm always interested in seeing mainstream coverage of this stuff. However, they really don't know what they're talking about. For example, the host says they're going to higher altitudes than the Apollo program, which is just utterly baloney. Really throws a wrench into the credibility of this news outlet, in my view at least.

    As for whether this mission is risky, yes it absolutely is. However, all manned space missions are risky and this one doesn't really have anything that makes it fundamentally unsafe.

    Look, NASA sets objectives to accomplish its missions to the ISS, and they work with the engineers at SpaceX to figure out how to accomplish them as safely as possible. These Polaris missions are fascinating in that the objectives are set jointly between the SpaceX team and a paying customer.

    The customer is interested in a few things, but it probably comes down to fame for doing new things. SpaceX is interested in developing the technologies and raising funds to get to Mars. Where their goals overlap is how we get the Polaris missions. I think that's pretty cool!

  • While the Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI) is responsible for developing the satellite bus, Korea’s Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) is in charge of the payloads.

    SpaceX is just launching the satellites.

  • Think a booster will complete 25 flights by the end of the year? I think so. We're close!

  • Personally, I think it's a great thing that the US arguably has the best military surveillance and communication satellites. Certainly I prefer money going there than into literal bullets. In any case, doesn't this have nothing to do with space tourism?

  • Instant upvote. Well played, my friend, well played.

  • My dear friend, the report is factually false. I can't speak for others, but I personally find it to only be responsible to help dispel false news. And for what it's worth, Elon is an asshole in my view, but that is irrelevant in this context, wouldn't you agree?

    As for the facts, you may check them yourself. Here is the actual application. Typo is on page 79, the actual figure is in the appendix on page 177.

    https://www.tceq.texas.gov/downloads/permitting/wastewater/title-iv/tpdes/wq0005462000-spaceexplorationtechnologiescorp-starbaselaunchpadsite-cameron-tpdes-adminpackage.pdf

    Maybe you're wondering why I am keen on sharing all this. I am a big fan of spaceflight, it's just something I like and find inspiring. False reports that lean heavily on "Elon Musk bad" make the spacefaring future I'm rooting for more difficult to achieve. Surely it's ok to correct misinformation?

  • I agree completely! Life is so cool. I would also say that we are a very, very long way from sending tons of dirt to Mars, but current probes are essentially sterilized, which adds billions to their cost, and for what?