I am assuming each drive shows up as an independent drive that you can raid up however you want in software?
Yeah, each drive is shown as if they were individually attached the machine. RAID how you want (or don't). I've got three 4TB drives in an 8TB RAID5, one 4TB that contains data from my gaming PC that I'm working on moving to the RAID, and then a separate 8TB external drive that everything on the RAID array is rsynced to for backup (not ideal but it's something).
Man I was looking for something like this, but at the time I was building my NAS, I couldn't find something similar so I just decided to build a whole new machine with enough space to contain the drives themselves. Had I known, I might have gone with this and a NUC or something.
I'm actually going the other way and building a proper server out of an ancient HP Proliant ML110 G2 that my dad gave me. Shockingly, it's fully ATX compatible and has 8+ drive bays. I'm just reusing the case though and stuffing it with more modern components; it was originally equipped with a Pentium 4 😂 I'm not a fan of the single USB connection for all that data.
How's the performance?
Sufficient I suppose. Limited by the single USB 3 connection. The Mac mini isn't stressed at all, but the RJ45 connector has some fucky Apple weirdness about it that causes it to go to sleep periodically. There's a workaround for it that I applied a while ago, but it still drops out occasionally. But, that's an Apple-specific problem, not the enclosure. The enclosure works fine.
Android’s new in-call protections1 provide an additional layer of defense, preventing you from taking risky security actions during a call like:
Sideloading an app for the first time from a web browser, messaging app or other source – which may not have been vetted for security and privacy by Google.
Because Play Store has a history of being a haven for only the most secure of apps.... 🙄🙄🙄
I don't necessarily disagree with this in theory, as you gotta have some reach in order to spread your message. I forget the name of the particular situation (people don't use it because it's not popular, and it's not popular because people don't use it.....etc etc)
That said, Twitter is a cesspool. Bluesky has enough users that it shouldn't be an issue reaching out via that instead.
Oh yeah, I have at least 10 apps on that haha. Fantastic piece of software. I use it for apps that aren't hosted on any sort of marketplace.
Great example: If you shop at Harbor Freight (American bargain tool store), then you're probably aware that they always have coupons for various tools. Someone created a database that catalogs all of their current coupons, HFQPDB, and they also provide an app (android only). The app isn't found anywhere else except that site.
I try to avoid the play store at this point. I even switched Tasker from the Play store version to the standalone non-google APK from João himself (Patreon-exclusive; or you can email him for a license, it's like $4).
Any time I implement an open-source project that offers an Android app, I immediately search their github/gitlab or F-Droid. I don't even try to look on the play store anymore. Too much tracking bullshit.
My Zero W lives in a Geekworm case with an RJ45 port, so it's wired directly to the router. I likely won't be using it for anything else at this point. Even just opening the web UI bogs it down pretty heavy.
Thought I just realized it's still running Raspbian (11, not 12), so maybe I'll look at running DietPi.
Portainer is way too bloated for personal use. I liked it initially, but the licensing shit was, well, shit, and the way it managed compose files was garbage. Dockge is way better for my use case, since it works alongside Docker, instead of fucking off to do its own thing.
I would just mount the NAS folders via Samba into the NUC. Problem is that services can’t watch the filesystem for changes. If I add a video to my Jellyfin directory, Jellyfin won’t automatically initiate a scan.
That sounds like a config issue. I use NFS shares in a similar way, and Plex/*arr/etc has zero issues watching for changes.
If you want reliability, keep your NAS as a NAS; don't run applications on the same system. If you screw something up, you'll have to rebuild the whole thing. Run your applications in a VM at the minimum, that way you can just blow it away and start over if it gets fucked, without touching the NAS.
If I can’t easily retrieve data from perfectly good drives, it is an absolute no go.
I've run the same md-raid array in three different machines (ok, I've added and swapped a couple drives, but still). I love that about md-raid. Pull the drives out of one system, stick them into another system with mdadm installed, and it recognizes the array immediately.
I went with OMV on older but plenty capable hardware (Intel 4th-7th gen) because 1. I'm cheap, and 2. I could configure it how I wanted.
Glad I went that way, because I was considering "upgrading" to a Synology for a while.
I now have my OMV NAS (currently running on a very-unstressed 2014 Mac mini and a 4-bay drive enclosure), and a separate Proxmox cluster with multiple VMs that use the NAS through NFS shares. Docker-focused VMs are managed by local Dockge instances, which is incredibly handy for visualizing the stacks. Dockge instances can also link to each other, so I can log into any Dockge instance and have everything available.
I can do command line stuff just fine, but I am a visual person, so having all that info right in front of me on one page is very, very helpful.
That's a really good question for which I do not have an answer.