Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)LI
Posts
0
Comments
106
Joined
6 mo. ago

  • I'm sorry how long until Clinton 2028 is announced? Anyway xi has genuine party support, given, you know, his policy guidance has allowed China to surpass the us' GDP while increasing the quality of life for citizens at all strata more than any other country in the same time period. That's without bringing up his push for high speed rail, which has allowed more rail to be laid in the last 15 years than the EU and US have in total, combined. Or the green energy mandates which have out paced the entire rest of the world combined...

    Successful leaders like xi tend to get reelected.

  • Sure, the kakistocracy of the US can be called an oppressive democracy since only the rich vote on legislation, but that's different from the peoples parliament which allows anyone to join and have power.

  • The one that raised the standard of living for more people, produces more green energy than the other, the one that has a worker lead democracy, the one that doesn't pretend they have ever been the greatest country, the one that does exclusively produce countries with school shooters...

  • The model has no censorship. Some websites running the model are hosted in China and thus do. Use one of the thousands of instances that run out of the US or run it yourself. It's not like chatgpt or other openai trash, it's system requirements are pretty low.

  • It's not solely about pay, but also what your work is used for. It makes sense you don't understand this if you've never created anything, artwise or otherwise. If I draw a picture I control who displays that picture and for what purpose. If someone I don't like uses that picture without permission it reflects poorly on me, and destroys my rights.

    The easy example is an art piece by a Holocaust survivor being used by a neonazi without permission.

    Now imagine you steal tens of millions of artists work. You know for a fact you don't have the licenses needed to ensure their work is used to their liking.

  • Yes, just because you disagree that your new toy is literally theft and is one of the most irresponsible inventions since leaded gasoline, that doesn't change anything.

    Sorry you're the type of person that added lead shot to your gas tank after they banned leaded gasoline.

  • Normalizing is a thing, on top of that there are still indie markets that can be supplanted by gan image generation. On top of that artists still have rights to their work, if they didn't explicitly license their works for the model, it's theft that removes the value of the original.

  • There's a pretty clear difference in the two. If piracy ended in a new digital good that removes the market for the original good while eliminating the jobs of those that made the original good, then it'd be close. Even then pretty much everyone agrees not all piracy is the same; you wouldn't pirate an indie game that hasn't sold well unless you're an absolute piece of subhuman shit.