Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
2
Comments
1,154
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • On average... couple bucks... each person

    Assuming you're not high as balls, please cite your sources. Additionally, by implying that each individual "person" is not already commodified as a body of data in a collection of similar is woefully naive. I know it's a common desire to weigh in on topics and feel that one's contribution is valid and worthy, but please look into this subject further before pulling sentences like these outta your ass. 🤪

  • The "argument" is to set precedent for denying refunds when they attempt to force users to sign into PSN before playing. Before, the simple fact that this was not made clear at point of purchase is a breach of contract on the part of the seller, and grounds for immediate refund of the improperly described terms of use. 😶

  • how much money was refunded. Doesn’t even get into the number of buyers they are excluding.

    The personal data of each player they do coerce into signing into PSN is far more lucrative than said game sales. Sony is into gaming as much as Santa is into manufacturing toys, FFS. 🤦🏽‍♂️

  • I prefer to assume any argument is made in good faith until proven otherwise, so please understand that the following criticisms are contextual and not, of course, personal.

    The cops are armed because everyone else is armed

    Bullshit. That implies that vast majority of interactions cops have with "everyone" else (ignoring the obvious hyperbole) while on the clock are with other armed people, which is not only patently false but dangerously presumptive in a grossly negligent way. In fact, the statement is so irrational that any statistic even comparing fatality rates between armed & unarmed individuals by cops would entirely debunk it; cops are not armed "because" others are, they're armed first and foremost — and have been, since the very concept of a "police force" was first invented, FFS.

    Demilitarisation of the police force can only come in...

    Considering your failure to grasp the predicating concept, I'm hesitant to trust that you got the key in hand here.

    ...a sensible conversation about your gun ownership.

    Again, this doesn't seem to be in your wheelhouse at the moment.

    It's not like owning guns actually protects you from bad cops.

    Logical fallacy and bait, not to mention an oversimplification of the actual issues at play.

    So, do you want to have an adult conversation or just bark across the pond (where we'll be touching on various police issues y'all have on your island yonder, to be sure), hmm?

  • you have crazies with the guns.

    Thafuq do you think the cops are‽

  • Are you fucking high? Some self-appointed Lorax for the Helldiver community here? Sounds pretty undemocratic of you, citizen.

  • That's spelled Illithid, cupcake. Sit down.

  • Right? The "cold shoulder" look is way more Tzeentch than Cthulhu. Fuckin' casuals.

  • This life is not a meritocracy. Don't drink the fuckin' Democracy™ juice. Be nicer to yourself and then, with that surplus, be nicer to others. 🙇🏽‍♂️🥳

  • He can see through time!

  • Says the old man who chooses not to tell Link he's just a damn clone that cycles up every century... Gee, I wonder where the moral is in that story.

  • That second shot's a clear view of where he's hidin' 'em, too. 😶