I don't think you're a jerk, but I think you've handled this badly and you're using 'objective and realistic' to justify it, but that's just code for not believing in him. Were you great at 16? Or were you merely good enough to get signed and thus benefit from decades of training and coaching that improved you? Do you not believe he will also improve? That's literally what not believing in him means.
It's one thing to inject some realism, to manage expectations, to encourage him to have a fallback, etc, and quite another to effectively say 'You're shit at this so you should just go get a job' or whatever.
They sorta did.. they called it ProPublica. Although they focus on investigative journalism and publish their work through other outlets rather than publishing the news themselves.
Listen, there are assholes everywhere, and even mild centrists can be dicks and break the rules. We can speak about tendencies and generalizations if you like, but there are plenty of people who aren't bigots who are giant flaming assholes on social media.
It isn't a purity test, it's a necessary accommodation of the fact that people in the US (and I say this as an American) think that the left ends at progressive liberalism, while everyone else in the world sees progressive liberalism as center-left at best because they acknowledge that 'the left' extends quite far past the bounds of Liberalism (the philosophy, not the political leaning), because Liberalism is about individualism and property rights but most people to the left of that are collectivist in some way shape or form.
Good point, many think left = liberal = US democrats who are centrists at best from the international perspective. So no, most people on here probably aren't actual leftists, but I'm guessing when they say they 'lean left' they mean US-liberal-not-conservative, not socialist or whatever.
Like everything on the right, decentralization is a means to an end, not a value in itself. They only care about it when it's useful for helping them get ahead. Just like they only care about free speech when it's them speaking to people who don't want to hear their bullshit.
I think most people feel this way, right? Like you are left-leaning if you like the policies in left-wing platforms put forth by left-wing parties, so you vote for the left-wing candidates who advocate for them. Likewise, candidates are left-wing because they are members of such parties and advocate for such policies. So saying 'I only vote for people on the basis of their policies and voting record' is like saying 'I only drink water when it's wet'—technically true, but it misses the point that you chose it because it was wet.
Major airlines don't generally do flights to regional airports (which I expect is because of runway size), those are mostly for private/chartered flights or smaller local airlines. This is an article on how to find those flights, by a website that purports to let you search for them.
I just watched it myself. They weren't fucking about, they weren't suspicious, they weren't unidentified, and they didn't have their lights off. I'm guessing the IDF killed them to hide some worse incident that they had just committed in the area recently. But there will never be consequences because of the US geopolitical interests served by Israel's actions.
This isn't a bad idea, but I think my priority in that situation would be some kind of feature the suppresses duplicate posts. I sub to multiple world news communities for example because they do get different posts, but also people post the same thing in several communities at the same time so I see a lot of duplicate posts. And only seeing news f.ex would only make the dupes even more frequent because they're not interspersed with other communities.
Ah, fair enough, that makes sense and I generally agree. I have my own beliefs and ideas about personified deities, but I agree, I dunno why some of these deities are even worshiped given their legacy of evil and assholery, so if they do really exist they should absolutely be opposed.
Demiurge in the Gnostic sense? Or is there some broader sense I'm not familiar with there?
So.. your position is that all gods are real according to their own cosmogony, and one of them in particular has pissed you off but the rest just don't rise to the level of being worth the effort of hating? My compliments, that's a pretty interesting position and one I've not seen before.
Libra00 @ libra00 @lemmy.world Posts 1Comments 659Joined 5 mo. ago
I don't think you're a jerk, but I think you've handled this badly and you're using 'objective and realistic' to justify it, but that's just code for not believing in him. Were you great at 16? Or were you merely good enough to get signed and thus benefit from decades of training and coaching that improved you? Do you not believe he will also improve? That's literally what not believing in him means.
It's one thing to inject some realism, to manage expectations, to encourage him to have a fallback, etc, and quite another to effectively say 'You're shit at this so you should just go get a job' or whatever.