libertyforever @ libertyforever @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

174

Joined

6 mo. ago

I didn't search your user history. If your position is all the recent presidents are bad, then that is fine. I don't have an issue with that.

Did you go this hard ranting against Biden and Obama?

You have not even brought up specific points that you disputed about the matter.

This is not even a point of dispute. If El Salvador won't return their own citizen, then it is what it is.

No way I would address everything in here. You would need to bring up a few specific points and not pages of documents.

I suppose you don't have any direct evidence to support your argument either.

If you look at the historical polls about the direction of the country, wrong track always win, it is just a matter of how bad.

Significant improvement since taking office is a good first step for the Trump administration.

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/state-of-the-union/direction-of-country

First, someone cannot be granted withholding of removal without having an order of removal. The immigration judge must first determine that the person is removable, and then the person can apply for withholding.

Second, the withholding of removal is limited to El Salvador, which means he can be deported to other countries.

As such, the error is the destination only

Can you elaborate what exactly do you disagree with?

The Trump administration already admitted this was an administrative error. I said that as well. Perhaps you should re-read what I wrote.

There is a valid and effective deportation order. For deportation purpose, there was no need to prove him guilty at the criminal court. If he was deported to another country, this would be completely in compliance.

You need to provide me exactly what you disagree with. Doesn't make sense for me to provide you sources for every fact in this matter.

Yes, I read the ruling. Would you like to elaborate on what you disagree with me about?

I was just stating the facts.

It was an administrative error. There is a valid deportation order for that man. There is also a withholding order which only applies to El Salvador. The only mistake in the deportation was the destination.

SCOTUS didn't order his return. The ruling was that this is a foreign policy matter at this point and the executive branch has foreign policy power, not the court. SCOTUS rule that the Trump administration has to facilitate his return. Trump is willing to facilitate his return, but El Salvador said no, and that is the end of discussion for this matter.

Anyway, it would be ridiculously weird for El Salvador to send their own citizen to the US who initiated came to the US illegally.

Not bragging, but certainly better than the last 4 years.

What do you mean 28% to elect Trump? Are you including people who are ineligible to vote?

Anyway, the problem is that you think the other side are deplorable instead of trying to understand why more voters voted for Trump rather than Kamala. You are the problem.

Have you been looking at the press pool list? How can you argue those are all favorable news outlets?