Leraje @ leraje @lemmy.blahaj.zone

This account is now backup only. I have moved to https://piefed.blahaj.zone

---

Read more

Posts

45

Comments

834

Joined

2 yr. ago

Never heard of this - thank you very much! Easy to move scripts/settings too - export from tamper as zip - import zip into violent.

Yep, plus a list of reasons why I might want to use it over other Matrix clients.

I think you misunderstood @pete_the_cat 's point. They weren't suggesting retroactive treatment had he been caught, they were suggesting that if he'd been properly treated he might never have committed the crimes he did.

Correct spelling.

LW is great - comes with UBO pre-installed. The only thing I'd say about it is that, for Linux users, avoid the appimage as its a bit twitchy and forgets settings sometimes.

As well as those others have already mentioned, I use:

Linguist is a translation extension that respects your privacy. If you switch to the Bergamot translator it acts in offline mode.

Redirector which allows you to set custom rules so you can redirect (for example) Twitter to Nitter, Instagram to PikUki and also rules to redirect pages that are behind paywalls via 12ft.io (or 1ft.io as 12ft is currently down) .

TamperMonkey a userscript manager. I don't have loads of userscripts but I do have things like SocialFixer for making FB a bit better, Absolute Enable Right Click and Bandcamp Volume Bar.

This is just my opinion but, given terrorist organisations are militarily usually much poorer/smaller/weaker than the group they stand against, they need help from outside.

One way to possibly achieve that is to do something awful to provoke your opposition into a retaliation so indiscriminate and horrifying that your ideological (if not literal) allies in the surrounding area step in to attack your enemy.

I've switched to Redirector from LibRedirect as I find it's more customisable - for example, I can create rules that automatically go to a 12ft.io redirect version of a page if the site is behind a paywall and a rule to redirect Instagram profiles to picuki.com.

"A lot" is the answer to your question. But communism is not one of the things we're having to deal with at the moment. Quite the opposite in fact.

They support communism - so China, Cuba, the old USSR and the modern Russia that is slowly reverting back to communism. So they are supportive primarily of the system no matter how it affects actual chinese, russian or cuban people. The people are of far, far less importance than the system and the more extreme their belief the more they'll deny the reality of how these regimes treat their people.

That's not to say it's all bad - Cuba has some very progressive laws for example but sadly for most of these regimes, dissent amongst the population is not tolerated.

They're most certainly not Russian or Chinese communists on Lemmy or Reddit as those people wouldn't be able to access these communities without breaking the law in their countries. That said, my interpretation of who they are as a group is only my opinion based on interacting with some of them.

As you're discovering, Leftism isn't a universal thing, there are sub-groups ranging from (US) Democrat/ (UK) Labour all the way through to individualistic anarchism. There are a lot of stopping points on the journey, none of which are the same as the others - socialism, communism etc and even within those sub groups there are sub-sub groups.

So the the word you're questioning 'tankie' is a term applied to communists who deny that communist regimes are capable of, or indeed have, committed acts of violence on individuals, groups or entire ethnic groups/populations. The word originates from the Tiananmen Square massacre, where the ruling communist party murdered protesting people using tanks. 'Tankies' deny that this happened, or if it did happen it wasn't as bad as the West claim, or if it was, that it was a justified act. They say the whole thing was made up/exaggerated by Western media. They do this because they're living in denial.

Most of the Lemmy (and Reddit) based tankies I've encountered seem to belong to a youngish American, probably middle-class population. Possibly they're rebelling against some element of their upbringing or are seeking some kind of group identity or validation. Believing in something that extreme is also an easy thing for someone to do - if you support a political system that is never ever going to assume power where you live, that abdicates you from any responsibility of engaging with the political system in your country to try and make the reality you actually live in any better.

I don't practice privacy because I think anyone's out to get me. I don't think the gvmt know or care that I exist, much less about the opinions that I hold. I'm not trying to hide, I'm just trying to be private. I don't want there to be a shadow profile of me but if there is I want it to be as inaccurate and meager as possible. I don't want to have tailored outrage designed to sway me politically shoved at me or to be a sellable data point to increase, however marginally, some billionaire's personal wealth.

So for me, the answer to your question is that privacy itself is the tangible benefit.

Calibre on local machine, sharing a database with self-hosted calibre-web, OPDS enabled using a Kobo to read.

Big tech companies aren't bothered that it happens, they're bothered they're not personally profiting from it.

I think that's good but protecting religion is questionable to me. I'm not saying its OK to attack people based on their religion but religion isn't a property of a person in the way their ethnicity or sexuality is, it's merely an opinion someone holds. If your wording is adopted, it'd be nice to see the difference between attacking who someone is and an opinion someone holds made clear.

Also needs to reference (dis)ability IMO.

It's not clear what you're saying? Are you saying transphobes are misogynists?

Mate, I'm 100% with you. It's just saddening and maddening that those of us who are fed up of having our faces and lives sold in order to enhance some cunts bottom line have to be the ones who put the effort in just to protect what is our right not to be a sellable data point.

I dunno. It's not like I didn't already think this, but sometimes it feels overwhelming. We have to buy products and services just to preserve what privacy we have in a never ending arms race of all these huge companies trying to own us all. All I want to do is sometimes share photos of my family and friends without worrying about my face or my kids faces ending up being sold to the highest bidder. I know that's just the way things are these days but it's still incredibly frustrating and annoying.

Whilst I agree it's wise to take precautions, it seems weird to me that we think its OK to expect the onus to be on us to curtail a normal activity like sharing a pic of you and your mates messing about rather than the onus on these companies not harvesting those pics to create a sellable database of us to allow governments to circumnavigate the need for warrants.

Edit: and with the amount of self-styled internet pranksters and influencers randomly shooting images and video of whatever they want, unless you leave the house wearing a balaclava you don't really have any choice of your face being part of their dataset.

Historically, we've always been pretty awful to each other. A lot of our cutting edge science has revolved around ways to hurt and kill each other since the first human realised it was easier to kill the person pissing him off with a rock than their hands.

In the last 100 years or so however, those weapons have become powerful enough to end us as a species and I think you'd be hard pressed to find a type of weaponry that, once invented, hasn't been used and I'm not sure we've evolved enough empathy to prioritise not killing all of us over not killing the country/group who are currently annoying us.

It's pretty understandable therefore to have a realistic fear that there's a very good chance we'll bring about our own end.

You do realise there's more ways to learn about group behaviour than interacting with the group online?