Ah yes, because people always have a choice. There's no way anyone competent would work at a larger company issuing devices with the company standard system running proprietary software that only functions on that system.
Territorialism. He thinks he can just demand Denmark to sell Greenland to him, but neither Denmark nor Greenland are having any of it. Big Baby didn't think he'd get pushback and does what he does best: get pissed.
Threads and twitter are both worse than bsky. I like Mastodon even more but bsky is at least a departure from open right extremist rhetorics.
I could debate the braindead assertion, but I don't feel like it, and in any case a braindead not-Nazi is a net improvement over a Nazi (which are braindead anyway) or a Neo-Nazi (who do a damn good job at imitating that).
In this case we're talking about Elmo displaying what is, in the context of his whole public presentation, clearly intended as a Nazi salute. So no, truthfully stating that other groups have used that salute too isn't the whole truth because it ignores the context of conversation.
Yes, only that's not what I am answering.
Yeah, but that wasn't originally the conversation you tacked on to.
Just that the gesture's meaning is not definitively only Nazi.
Sure, but why point that out, when it's not relevant to the conversation of Elmo being a Neo-Nazi? Maybe this helps to consider the optics of your comment:
Media: "Controversial" salute
Comment: Not controversial, just Nazi
You: Well, there are other meanings for the gesture
That sounds a whole lot like the apologism going around trying to paint Elmo as misunderstood.
catch and guess what others think from fundamentally insufficient amount of information.
That's communication in general. We use shorthands so we don't always have to elaborate, but a lot of things pick up different meanings in different contexts.
And in the specific context - because, again, the initial comment you responded to was specific to this specific display of this specific gesture - Elon has displayed a lot of Neo-Nazi behaviour. That doesn't mean he has to be a Neo-Nazi (you're right, see can't know for sure what he thinks) but that he's courting their favour (because we can see what he does). That makes it rather reasonable to assume that a known Neo-Nazi-courter producing something looking like an edgy teenager's imitation of Hitler's salute is indeed performing a Nazi salute.
No matter what else the gesture can mean, it's clear what this instance is intended to signal.
I said justification, not purpose. They claim they want to track usage to tailor your experience to you.
They don't actually believe that, of course, but respecting your explicit expression of interest ought to be the minimum perfunctory concession to that pretense. By this we can see just how thin a pretense it is.
Yes, the NSDAP, donning the disguise of a Worker's Party, adopted a lot of worker movement symbology, and through their prominence has given it awful connotations. Unsurprisingly, the modern ideological descendants have taken up many of those same symbols.
Yes, other groups use some of those symbols, or some of the other symbols you mentioned. That doesn't mean the symbols are now innocuous. It just means context matters. A single element (like the torches) in a different context (like an Armenian group) doesn't make them Nazis. A hooked cross in the context of Hinduism might mean luck instead.
And in the context of people endorsing Neo-Nazi bullshit, the Nazi salute is very much unmistakable as that.
Even in the best-intentioned recommender system, trained on the content you watch to estimate what you're interested in and recommend similar things, that would be the drift of things. You can't really mathematically judge the emotions the viewers might feel unless they express them in a measurable way, so observing their behaviour and recommending similar by whatever heuristic. And if they keep clicking on rageposts, that's what the system has to go on.
But at least giving the explicit indication "I don't want to see this" should be heavily weighted in that calculation. Just straight up ignoring that is an extra layer of awful.
You'd think a recommendation algorithm should take your preferences into account - that's the whole justification for tracking your usage in the first place: recommending relevant content for you...
Stopped clocks and all, they're still endorsing an absolute shithead over one issue that he hasn't even actually delivered on, but who has good reason to insist on authoritarian surveillance measures.
If you care about privacy, betting on companies that suck up to Authoritarians is a bad idea.
Ah yes, because people always have a choice. There's no way anyone competent would work at a larger company issuing devices with the company standard system running proprietary software that only functions on that system.