Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)LE
Posts
8
Comments
936
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • I believe the two requirements for level 2 are 200 VAC and 2 kW. A 208V 30A oven outlet in a typical American apartment is level 2, but so is a 240V, 15 A plug in a typical European, well, any room.

    The 240V, 30A+ portable EVSEs many cars come with are level 2, though they are often also able to do level 1 charging if they work on 120V outlets.

  • That link includes a whole lot of old things as well as blog posts about how they sped up the performance of the Firefox snap, after which there doesn't seem to be much, if any, further evidence of the snap being slow.

  • The claim that snaps are a Canonical NIH thing is falsified by those two facts. Even if Canonical said "okay, we'll distribute desktop apps with Flatpak," that wouldn't affect the vast majority of their ongoing effort for snaps, which are related to things that Flatpak simply doesn't do. Instead, they'd have the separate work of making the moving target of flatpaks work with their snap-based systems such as Ubuntu Core while still having to fully maintain that snap based ecosystem for the enterprise customers who use it for things that Flatpak simply doesn't do.

  • I don't like snaps because it's just another Canonical NIH thing. Everyone else agreed on flatpak which seems to have a good design with portals and all and being fully open.

    Snaps both predate flatpak and do things that Flatpaks are not designed to do.

    Canonical have also been a part of the desktop portals standard for a very long time, as they've been a part of how snaps do things.