leisesprecher @ leisesprecher @feddit.org

Posts

2

Comments

643

Joined

12 mo. ago

I myself enjoyed every single lecture I had

I didn’t like all lecturers

Haters might call that a contradiction.

I didn’t confirm your experience, therefore I must be lying.

No, you're lying because you don't confirm the almost universal constant that nothing of that magnitude can be all positive. Net positive, sure. Mostly positive, absolutely. But all positive? Bullshit. Especially, if you keep backtracking.

You're lying to yourself, and you know it.

It is physically not possible to enjoy everything. You already backtracked, suddenly you were bored, but sitting through something boring is not bad for some reason?

And that is utter bullshit.

You can't be that dense to seriously say you enjoyed every single lecture. That's a lie, and you know it.

BTW, I'm from one of those "some countries". And no, nobody, not a single person enjoyed everything. That's not how reality works.

Who are you trying to impress here?

Sorry, but that's just an absolutely snobbish way of looking at education.

Of course it's an investment, you spent years of your life, took exams, wrote theses, sat in boring lectures because a person in their late teens and early 20s has nothing better to do than that? Yeah, sorry, that's bullshit and you know it.

I don't want to discourage you, but this is not how those are supposed to look.

The filling should be just a pale off-white: https://i.pinimg.com/736x/f8/a3/3d/f8a33d37d549c22893f9958f381d1f3b.jpg

Follow up question: do you need to feed one blended billionaire to one unblended billionaire, or would it be sufficient to feed just a certain percentage?

Unfortunately, Twitter is still used by many media outlets and politicians as a gauge for public sentiment. Just by changing the narrative on there he can change the elite's perception of reality.

It's called elite projection. They believe that they personally not only know everything and are right all the time, they also want to force everyone to think like them. It's the same mechanism as with stalinism.

No. He's trying to get right wing extremists into power, because they won't stand in his way if he treats workers and nature as his property.

He got reigned in by unions, environmental activists, agencies and society in general when he tried to ignore every law and regulation he could find at his Berlin gigafactory. That pissed him off big time and it's not the only time it happened.

He's a petty little man with too much money.

For most of the practical use cases, a mechanism to somehow link to your own instance would be enough.

I often stumble upon links to other instances, but from there, there's no direct way to interact via my own instance. I have to awkwardly copy URL parts around or search the post in my own instances UI.

And then what? Also, that won't be legal in the EU.

I mean, you take billions of dollars to develop an AI to put into a product you already have, making it less competitive in the process to ... develop a slightly better AI maybe?

Where exactly is the return on investment here?

That's way too simplistic, as often.

For the shareholders, having an investment of several billions turn into an unwanted add-on for a few dollars is not a good thing. It's the opposite, almost like a fire sale.

I really wonder what their long term plan is here.

Hardly anyone really wants copilot, it doesn't add a lot of value, yet makes the product less competitive.

I totally get rent seeking, Office is so ingrained that it's almost impossible to get away from it. But why force AI on everybody? Why not add it as a bonus?

Is this just a desperate attempt to soften the massive losses of the AI investment?

So, you fucked up and it's postgres' fault?

The scale needed is ridiculous. You'd probably need one of those plants for every 1000 people on the planet.

I'd much rather capture CO2 from waste incinerators or (bio) gas plants or any other "residual" CO2 emitter that's not burning fossil fuels. At least it's pretty simple to filter out of their exhausts.

And I'm 95% sure these plants will be used as an argument for running fossil fuel devices longer. It's "not so bad" after all.

Maybe I'm too autistic to read her, but that woman is not mourning looking.

Reality is, they will just rebrand employees.

You're not a developer anymore, but a customer satisfaction consultant. Same job as before, but technically not a developer!!

Also, this is a great way to reduce headcount while seeming innovative to the market ghouls.

You could have photoshopped some swifties or Beatles groupies being broken, like the heads of South Park Canadians.

I understand, though, that you're not a peak performance when overheated. Thermal throttling affects us all.

And given how much they tend to fuck themselves over, maybe not even themselves.

These patches do offer some benefits for cloud providers or in general orgs that host a bunch of different products on potentially the same machine.

I could see benefits in them, especially if the v3 or whatever addresses some of the issues.