leisesprecher @ leisesprecher @feddit.org

Posts

2

Comments

643

Joined

12 mo. ago

You might as well argue that healthy people are a drag since care in old age is so expensive.

See, I'm German. We have a solidarity based health insurance (mostly). I'm a young, reasonably healthy guy with a reasonably high income. All in all I pay 840€ every month (that's the maximum amount), even though I cost next to nothing. And I'm okay with that.

Yes, smoking is bad and I don't like smokers. But denying them healthcare is deeply deeply inhumane. And in Germany even unconstitutional.

I'm really confused about his statement.

I mean, let's assume he's right, and let's assume that a vaccine only protects you for, say, 20 years. Just measles induced encephalitis alone has a lethality of 0.1%. How many cases of anything more than a mild fever did any vaccine ever cause? He's not even claiming it's causing autism or death or transformation into Space Godzilla. So why not just vaccinate? It's stupid even in his own world.

That's unfortunately an extremely slippery slope.

If vaccines (or lack thereof) are enough to refuse "service", why treat lung cancer in smokers? What about type 2 diabetes?

What are you even trying to express here? That's just childish phrases glued together.

Do you assume a dead body has feelings?

The fact that you immediately jumped to depression seems like you didn't even think about the question.

There is literally no reason to live, we've made that all up. That's not depression, that's reality. Pushing fundamental questions into a pathological corner is condescending.

That's not really how black holes work. They evaporate really quickly when they're small enough. And if they're small, they don't have much gravity either.

Yes, because you're completely missing the point.

There is literally no risk involved for them in just staying. They had their jobs, and they could easily do the right thing by just following the law. If they were to be fired, they would still get severance of some sort. In any case, it would have slowed down Elon at least for a while.

What they did instead is resigning, thus not getting severance, not being able to slow anything down, making room for obedient bootlickers, and finally they're now unemployed.

So tell me again: how is resigning the right move? They made the world worse, and they made their personal life worse. Literally no benefit for anyone.

Your entire argument is ex post. You see the fact that they resigned as a given and try to justify that. Why can't you see that this is not a necessary condition?

... because they resigned. Seriously, what's your point?

If they wouldn't have resigned, they would still have a job. And since they couldn't have been fired easily, they would have continued to have a job for quite a while.

That's not a complex concept, what's so hard to understand about that?

No. They resigned from a job. They were not fired. And as long as they don't break any rules, it's hard to fire them.

That's the thing, though. They're not really taking risks.

Much of what DOGE does is completely illegal and does not go through the proper channels and processes. By simply doing their jobs and forcing everything through the proper processes, they can slow down everything, maybe even to a halt, while being completely in the right and thus can't be fired.

Yes, it takes a mental toll, but these guys have a responsibility.

I see. We're at full blown ad hominem and removed even the pretense of argumentative value.

That's of course a sure sign of maturity.

Maybe all the juniors around you suck, because the good ones don't need to waste their time with arrogant, abrasive coworkers.

But that's exactly what Microsoft promised its shareholders and why they invested billions into it. They need world changing revenue to make it worthwhile.

It's already fourth tier after L1, L2, L3 caches.

Maybe something like optane will make a comeback. Having 16gb of soldered RAM and 500gb of relatively slow, but inexpensive optane RAM would be great.

I tried cursor, claude, copilot. They're not good.

Like, they can sometimes generate 10 lines of perfectly reasonable code, but they constantly completely misunderstand my intention or simply produce garbage. But the garbage looks just good enough, that you actually have to read and understand it, which slows me down.

Maybe we're operating in completely different worlds, but even for the junior devs in my company, typing speed was never an issue. I'm sure, within a few years LLMs can generate much better code, but I don't see widespread unemployment. They need way too much babysitting and result in worse code.

No, I fully understand your point, I just think it's shit, and since your first reaction to being challenged is a shitty attempt at belittling, I have to assume you're about as valuable as your point.

Why would I trust the judgement of someone who can't even fathom the concept of "someone else might have a valid point"?

If you're really careful, you might see that I qualified that statement above

it killed too few people for many to care

The emphasis is there for a reason.

And BTW, that statement is not a joke, but based on actual study results. You know why? Covid having a 2% mortality also means it has a 98% survival rate - much much higher in younger healthier people. Exactly that was the problem. For the vast majority of people covid did not feel like a real threat, because it wasn't. Long covid and the other long term effects only really came to light in 2021 and later.

I didn't shelter in 2020 for myself, but for others. If there is no such thing a society, individuals will act like selfish assholes and don't wear masks, get vaccinated, etc. If Covid would have caused widespread erectile dysfunction, the entire world would have been shutdown in 5min and nobody would even doubt masks.

Can't we just have a regular old plague that kills like 30% of the population and not that sigma "I don't really want to kill you" bullshit?

Covid was so annoying, because it killed too few people for many to care. I don't want that again.

You're right in your analysis, but the prediction is wrong, I'm afraid.

The next "big thing" is taking over the government. See Musk and his gang. He's not alone and the US isn't the only country this is happening in. Corporations inject themselves into each and every transaction, every aspect of life and politics. That way they have essentially infinite money at their hands.

That's exactly what I mean. Condescending, arrogant, and confidently incorrect.