no. but i try to forgive myself for not taking the opportunity. imo, it is a skill that forms through a lot of interactions. a form of rizz. and to me, it doesn't come as natural.
While the proposed bill's goals are great, I am not so sure about how it would be tested and enforced.
It's cool that on current LLMs, the LLM can generate a 'no' response like those clips where people ask if the LLM has access to their location -- but then promptly gives advices to a closest restaurant as soon as the topic of location isn't on the spotlight.
There's also the part about trying to contain 'AI' to follow once it has ingested a lot of training data. Even goog doesn't know how to curb it once they are done with initial training.
I am all up for the bill. It's a good precedent but a more defined and enforce-able one would be great as well.
Brown and other critics of ranked choice voting contend the system is confusing, and he said there are numerous instances in which voters didn’t end up ranking their choices.
"Ranked choice stupid. Me think why waste time vote lot peeps when one vote do trick."
I know that there's one benefit that they do help with the carbon footprint, but factories (law-exempted for some reason), personal jets, yachts and cruise ships make me feel this personal contribution is moot.
there's also the fact that most electric cars are shipped with privacy invasive data collectors most of use didn't ask nor pay for.
still amuses me how yt "algo face" ended up being like that.
I wonder how the future would try to explain massively showing 3(or 5) face holes correlated to being clickbait.