lazynooblet @ lazynooblet @lazysoci.al

Posts

23

Comments

790

Joined

2 yr. ago

Yes but it is licensed based and focused on business customers.

If you don't know, don't answer

Everything on the internet is fake

Yeah it's more plausible that this type of media is being exploited by bad actors

I have my dream domain. It was being squatted for a similar amount. I offered £100 and it was declined, I offered £250 and they replied to tell me the domain is easily worth the £2K, well sort after etc. I told them that this is my surname, and I'm not a corporation with unlimited funds and they can take the offer or leave it. 15 minutes later the offer was accepted. I was so happy. Still am chuffed about it.

I tried to get a squatted .UK domain through this process. Nominet are the authority for these domains. After acknowledging the request to both parties, I am then asked to pay £100 to assign a mediator. I guess this puts off frivolous requests, but it put me off going further.

This is so cute. Just what I needed

I don't think extensions are a "bother" at all. It's just a different way to show the info.

I don't think it would help. Even without the extension it would still say:

not-malicious.pdf (Application)

We are trained to see file extensions and understand them, but the masses aren't. There is a column that translates the hidden extension into its corresponding type already.

Omg I had to zoom in on the 4th bottle and work my way back. Trippy

And the trump supporters are like "omg yeah you're so right, wow, isn't he clever"

You're arguing with someone who was agreeing with you 😑

I expect most usage of authy was based on the open TOTP protocol that Google etc use. The additional benefit was backing up those codes to the authy account, hence the avenue of attack on those accounts.

I agree though, Authy, especially since it was bought out, should be avoided. They deprecated their desktop app which was the only semi useful part of their suite, but I stopped using it years ago.

I have no idea. It's a shower thought, not sure if it's reflecting reality.

If I were a labour shadow cabinet member 2 years ago I'd be thinking I don't have a chance of actually performing the primary role. But oh boy, times change quickly.

Another post has a good point. It's likely there will be a shake up of the labour cabinet early on so if they think anyone isn't prepared, they will be swapped out.

If you use Mettle, the phone based bank, you get FreeAgent for free. FreeAgent is a really good web based accounting package that works in Firefox. They gave a useful accompanying API and can do payroll, VAT, end of year and director self assessment. It's great.

"Clamshell mode". That's cool. I'm stealing that.

I thought I was in linuxmemes

Thank you. That is a good explanation.

Okay, I understand so far.

What I am struggling with is the limitations of duristriction.

So the EU finds the Australian company in breach of their rules. They send a notice of intent to pursue damages to the Australian company. And they tell the EU to kick rocks.

Surely laws made up in one country don't apply in all. The internet makes this a muddy area, as it's fully connected and nothing is stopping Joe in Netherlands from signing up to a service hosted in Vietnam. The Vietnam company can just ignore GDPR, ignore requests, ignore fines.

So say a local Australian software company tells you to get fkd. What can the EU regulator do?