Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)LR
Posts
0
Comments
308
Joined
11 mo. ago

  • They're not though.

    In Steam, you have to open the settings for each game individually to set it.

    In ProtonUp-Qt, you get a list of all of the games installed with their proton DB rating in one column and a drop down to select the compatibility layer in another. So you can easily set several games almost at once, without having to set it globally.

  • Really the only things I'm still using Windows for are work (even if I replace my workstation with Linux, which I'm working on doing, I still have to manage the Windows servers), and simulator games (peripherals work in Linux but often need extra fussing to get them working correctly so for now I'm just sticking with Windows on that machine)

  • Because different servers would have different rules and moderators so if one becomes toxic like that you could block the instance and stick to ones that are actually helpful

  • Gotta love finding the exact issue you're having being asked, and closed as duplicate, and what they say it's a duplicate of isn't even the same issue and doesn't apply to you...

  • The times I think about switching back, I just think back to the first month on Linux full time when I realized I was no longer constantly pissed off at everything my system was doing I didn't want it to do or not doing that I did want. And a lot of it wasn't even conscious anymore, like just realizing that a constant background radiation was just ... Not there anymore.

    Of course, having to use it at work every day still helps remind me... But I'm working on at least making my workstation into a Linux box, even if the servers are still going to be Windows.

  • XanderOS way tf back in 2005 or 2006, but mostly just messed around and had no clue what I was doing with it... After that I did a Gentoo install. Been kinda off and on with Linux since, flirting with the possibility of switching to it fully but never actually making the jump until last year when I built a new machine and put Mint on it.

  • You did say "I don't use Windows" which sounded like you were saying you didn't know if what they were saying was technically plausible or reasonable, and without knowing what you do or don't know about Windows or DOS, figured I'd respond with the presumption that it's possible you're only really familiar with *NIX systems (which is not a judgement).

    I find it kludgey and unnecessary to shut down that way, but it's not exactly a bad idea, and it does not require admin rights.

    And there's no reason it wouldn't be supported: when you run the file, it opens it in a terminal window, it's exactly like if you manually opened it and typed it from a technical point of view.

    And if someone malicious has the ability to edit a file on your desktop, they could do a lot more dangerous things, pretty much anything you could put in the batch file, more or less directly.

    Really, the only issue here is that you'd always be force closing your programs when you shut down which increases the odds that eventually they might corrupt one of their files... Not a huge risk, but non-zero.

  • I can't speak for them if they're joking or not but it's something you can absolutely do. *.bat files (short for "batch", as in a batch of commands to execute in sequence) are the script files for the Windows command line, and can be executed by double clicking on them

  • Yep. Linux is as easy or often easier to install than Windows. The main difference is people rarely install Windows, it's just there, by default.

    The Big issue, I think, is the tyranny of the default.

    The rest of the usability issues will get fixed with greater adoption rates if they come.

    But yeah, once you get over the hurdle of going against the default, the deluge of choice is overwhelming, much like why Mastodon and Lemmy didn't see huge usage spikes when Twitter and Reddit went to shit, but Bluesky did.

  • The problem is, Ubuntu from my understanding will try to install the snap version even if you explicitly are installing the deb version, including replacing a deb version with a snap when you update.

    I've not experienced this personally as I stopped using Ubuntu before they started doing snaps, maybe they've gotten better about that, but I don't trust a corpo run distro to not enshittify at every opportunity, so...

  • Mint is basically Ubuntu with a lot of the questionable decisions fixed (and uses Cinnamon instead of Gnome, so it's a bit more Windows like).

    It doesn't have snaps (though they provide instructions to add them if you want), it uses apt for packages and I believe pulls from a mixture of the Ubuntu repos and their own. It also has Flatpak out of the box and the software center does both, and clearly marks which you're going to install with an easy drop down to switch if both are available.

    Flatpak has been pretty solid for me overall, though there are occasional gotchas.

    Honestly, I'd recommend going with Mint, pretty much anything that works with Ubuntu will work with it, and it's better put together in my opinion (and doesn't try to sell you a pro subscription by implying your system will be insecure if you don't, which Ubuntu does). I know you're not looking to switch, but I've honestly been very unimpressed with Ubuntu for the last, oh, decade or so