kugel7c @ kugel7c @feddit.de

Posts

1

Comments

131

Joined

2 yr. ago

Well I might look at this Rosa Luxemburg Foundation or perhaps this Heinrich Böll Foundation if I were in need to peddle some specific policy to someone that both cares and is powerful. It's in many ways the same prisoners dilemma as with all of advertisement.

So yes if they were all gone it'd be better for everyone but as we unfortunately live in the system we live in I'd rather have the few that might actually represent me exist beside all of the garbage. Same with the political parties they are associated with as well.

Yeah this whole thing a bit maximized might be neatly wrapped up in this Hegelian insight rephrased in 2014 found on the wiki

"It is Hegel's insight that reason itself has a history, that what counts as reason is the result of a development. This is something that Kant never imagines and that Herder only glimpses."

In this way if not even the greats can do it how could a modern person or a think tank but at the same time does this not imply we currently need all three of them.

Also is the modern YouTube video essay channel sort of a think tank for terminally online people ? Maybe food for thought, maybe a joke who knows really.

It would be funny if it weren't so sad. As much as reading and understanding smith and other philosophy is important for the individual, think tanks unfortunately seem necessary in a modern context aiming to transform, often quite unreadable, as your excerpt demonstrates, philosophical learning, into applicable law/policy.

As with everything this process is utterly captured by right wing and market fundamentalist interests. Just sort this list by Bias/Affiliation and skim some of the descriptions it's a bit horrific, but it also might save you from reading an old school stochastic parrot with an inhumane agenda. Or if you actually find one you can agree with it might give you a reasonable first source.

The Adam smith institute is a right wing free market think tank with likely very questionable donors. wiki It likely doesn't really do research but takes sources that support their preexisting believes and retells them.

Certainly it was at least very hard to make the capitalist exploitation of the worker so all encompassing before the invention of the mechanical watch (Although there was likely a ton of housework and the general situation was garbage what with feudal lords and all that) . It then likely exploded with the industrial revolution and at least in places where the working class managed to emancipate themselves got somewhat cut back. Now especially for countries outside of the west and increasingly also the US and parts of EU it's likely getting worse, especially with multi employment and precarious employment(gig work, semi self employment, 0h contracts, mechanical turk ...).

Generally i feel work where you or your peers get to keep the total output of your work isn't really a problem, it's a problem when your work gets appropriated into this terrible machine and as a result you are alienated from the work.

Bike for sure, as I was still at school I did 100+km /week. I guess it stuck. Second is probably kayaking although it is seldomly actually useful transport. Then walking, and after that all manner of trains, then cars, then busses, and last planes. But honestly I just like being in transport to some extend so unless I'm dreading my destination I like them all.

If sapolsky is to be believed we have the natural inclination to view in- and out- group as part of our brain. Everything else is learned or a coping mechanism. I guess this is why people propose lived multiculturalism especially during childhood as a solution to xenophobia.

No matter if he can be believed or not on this fact the book is fun wiki

Yes and it feels subjectively to be connected to generally more rigours testing / recommendations specifically in the way that nowadays YouTube is much faster to get me recommended channels that are a little further away but still close to the stuff I'm already watching.

Unfortunately that's true if I watch good video essays or effin vtuber clips so...

Rojava wants a few words.

You are right but also wrong at the same time. People might be able to be antisemitic without being Nazis, but if they are in this way afraid or in rejection of 'the other' they've certainly at least been taught this kind of thinking by a fascist that tries to exploit both them and 'the other' for their own gain. In this way the Israeli right wing Government as well as IDF and police are thoroughly fascist just as much and in exactly the same way as Hamas are. “no blacks, no dogs, no Jews” can not be put up by a person that hasn't been taught to reject others in this way, this rejection is the fascist lie they have internalized, and it is the reason why we call them a fascist.

The splintering of this concept of rejection into, antisemitism racism homophobia Islamophobia patriarchy .... isn't useful when trying to reject the ideas of their suppression, it only muddies the waters. They are the same struggle against unjustified oppression, in parts of which we may be a benefactor, and in other parts we may be oppressed, this shouldn't make their existence any more justifiable.

To cowardly to scream so I hiss at the mirror instead.

In the first part I disagree, fortune 500 aren't looking for ideas they are gathering data, the difference here is one of quantity. And they will at least usually not gather free form things unless they have significant resources to commit to sorting through it. Or it's specifically payed support.

Feedback is valuable only if actionable, if the feedback can't be acted on because one dev largely already said yes and the other one largely thinks there is more important stuff right now it's not actionable. That's why companies have teams specifically for market research or marketing or whatever, they don't usually let the devs gather it themselves. And in the case of big open source projects with full time staff handling the issues on the GitHub might be partially done by a not dev team. Or a dev team member that's not a dev themselves.

Yes the dev can choose to spend time bickering about this here, I don't really care and I never said he should develop instead, I might think it's stupid but again who cares. Ignoring would perhaps have been better but blocking for 7 days is almost like ignoring, just that the trigger is blocked for 7 days as well, completely reasonable to do if it was actually annoying, and it might've been considering it was two largely unnecessary comments.

I even agree with you that the devs seem sorta toxic and maybe their project management style is unhealthy, but they are devs, as long as they continue to develop a reasonable software who cares how it's run. They are not pr or even project managers, they are devs, maybe they chose their job by what they can do and just ended up having to do the community management on GitHub as well because their software is open source.

If they actually had active control over the future of the software in the general sense, i.e. if it was closed source i would be concerned with the characters running the project. But it's open source, the future doesn't depend on specific devs, it's explicitly set up so that the current devs could die or delete it or whatever, and in response anyone willing could create a fork with a scheduler and anything else they might want, it even works with a federated approach so any fork would be backwards compatible.

Opening an issue that is a feature request is hardly a contribution, especially if there are few full time devs it might be a distraction more than a contribution, and there is like 1 open source competitor.

Ideas are free, finished working code is expensive, if the devs think they can't get to it in the next N years they probably just don't want to see it.

As I said I don't buy how this would be an actual problem, maybe it's rude but who cares, the admin is essentially an end user demanding something, at the end of the day he can write it himself or stfu. The devs time will certainly be spent better almost anywhere else than arguing on a GitHub issue.

Idk if they care about a particular thing FOOS devs are often petty. I don't think it's actually a threat to the project. Like read unix mailing lists from Linus or whoever else, it can get downright toxic. e.g.:

"BULLSHIT. Have you looked at the patches you are talking about? You should have - several of them bear your name. [...] As it is, the patches are COMPLETE AND UTTER GARBAGE. [...] WHAT THE F*CK IS GOING ON? " here

It not only flares up it's an integral part of the vicious circle of violence.

Each sides actions fuel the hate of the other, and reignite and deepen it, because those actions are rooted in hate and as such perpetrate the kind of violence that breeds hate...

The identification and suppression of an other is sort of the point of conservative politics. Crisis breeds conservative politics. If both sides cause crisis for each other ....

It's obviously not a law of nature, but it seems mediation and/or threatening from a 3rd party is almost required to break out of it.

Police violence eviction and the entire prison system are political violence, we've never stopped using it so how is there anything new here.

• Acerola - Video Game shaders and other digital art techniques
• Andrewism - hopefull Philosophy / Politics
• Eisenbahn in Ö, D, CH - Trains (in german)
• carykh - AI and various
• jan Misali - Conlang + various + Mashups
• Marco Reps - Electronics and EE
• Then & Now - History/Philosophy
• NeverKnowsBest - Lengthy Video Game reviews/ History of Gaming
• BobbyBroccoli - Science scandals
• Applied Science - Various science and Eng
• Asianometry - Semiconductor / Engineering / Taiwan / History / Economics (very frequent uploads)
• RMTransit - Transit (NA focus)
• Tom Nicholas- more politics
• Junferno - Software Development in sarcastic weeb
• Oliver Lugg - I don't even know
• People Make Games - Video Game Journalism

I tried to only pick stuff <1M subs excluding game play and news.

I know this isn't really an option for most people but consider dropping Deloitte KPMG and all banks that aren't cooperatives.

Could also be a Kurd

It's sort of an accelerationistic take on broken IP law I'm sure of it.

Your experience might be true, but to frame it as representative or real in any general way like you insinuate with;

if you/they want people to switch up the way they do things, there needs to be an alternative that’s at least as good, but preferably better.

is just disingenuous, you admit you live in a place with 4000 people, yet still you complain about transit. It fundamentally doesn't matter because you are in the last couple of percent in terms of transit viability.

That's why it reads like propaganda because while the examples you give are likely true, the overall picture you paint is significantly worse than the lived experience of most people that use the system, because you consciously or accidentally collect examples that make it seem dysfunctional. It's mismanaged and it could be much better but it isn't dysfunctional.