Exactly my point, actually. It's not that it's harder to make malware for Linux, but as a desktop OS, there's just a really small demand for it at this point in time. I don't doubt that when and if Linux gets more mainstream (again, for the desktop) more malware will be produced for it, we're actually already seeing an increase in malware.
But we're also seeing a big change in package distribution for Desktop Linux, mainly with flatpak and more specifically flathub. We're kind of leaving behind our baby stage and becoming more professional and secure when it comes to how software is distributed for our users.
I'm excited to see how our community grows and develops and how we handle challenges that only bigger operating systems have had to deal with.
In my opinion the windows way of doing it is very unsafe, especially for regular users (who mostly use windows) that don't exactly know who's trustworthy, and especially on such a mainstream OS that is much more vulnerable to malware.
Linux has it very well figured out with repositories, especially universal ones like flatpak. They're much more secure and trustworthy. It has the benefits of a walled garden and the benefits of an open ecosystem.
We just don't want history repeating itself like what happened with xmpp. Do you really think facebook of all companies is joining the fediverse with good intentions? Do you really think they're not trying to monopolize this?
kayden @ krimsonbun @lemmy.blahaj.zone Posts 6Comments 336Joined 2 yr. ago
yet you iphone venezuela 100 garillion dead!!1!1!!!!1!1!