kpw @ kpw @kbin.social

Posts

12

Comments

252

Joined

2 yr. ago

You're not fooling anyone.

How do you know? We should fix this on the software level.

You can block the entire domain.

So we should defederate because we will have issues defederating due to the amount of content we lose? Isn't that kind of self-contradictory?

Outside of for-profit corporations and outside of academia? So neither the private sector nor the public sector? Who should do medical research then?

I like your considerations, but there are no conclusions on how users/admins/developers should act to achieve this ideal state.

There should be an option to make posts instance-local for such things.

I don't see any spam from threads.net.

If a user blocks a domain I suppose their content isn't send to that server anymore I hope?

I'm not sure I understand your question or why you think of those statements as being exclusive. I will try to answer separately.

is the fediverse a service that should allow Threads/Meta

The good thing about the Fediverse is that it isn't a single service, but many federated ones. For any single instance, I think not defederating maximizes user freedom: A user who wants to interact with Threads can do so while a user that doesn't want to see any content from Threads can block their domain.

is it like XMPP and doesn’t have to be popular

I think it's a little bit different from XMPP, in a sense that the Fediverse is a public space where I communicate with strangers, so I would like it to be popular at least among people with shared interests. For instant messaging I just need my friends there, but sure it would be easier if I didn't have to show everyone how to create an XMPP address and what client to use.

Easily incorporated into the posts themselves

We should definitely block instances who insert ads into the content. However there is no evidence of threads.net doing something like this.

Not now… But they can easily do it if they get a majority market share. Don’t behave like they want? Defederated from the majority of the content.

They could threaten to defederate from us so we should defederate from them? It makes no sense.

Are you familiar with the story of EEE and XMPP?

XMPP works great, I use it everyday. It doesn't have to be popular, you only need to convince some of your friends to use it.

That would be awesome, wouldn't it be?

Do you think we live in the best possible of worlds where nothing can be improved anymore?

From my point of view the mathematicians are evil.

Well, then you are lost!

Boring tech is awesome.

Yes, they should be legally required to open up access to their service. No more walled gardens that hold a large number of users hostage.

Yes. It's a window manager, not tmux.

If the instance defederates, users do not have an option to interact with the defederated instance anymore. The only choice you have then is to join an instance where the moderation policy agrees with your values or host your own instance. If you just want to see if defederation was the right idea, you could just visit those instances directly and look at their local timeline.

I never said anything like that.

Yes? At least people on the stock market are putting up their money instead of just talking.

According to the stock market, yes. If you know otherwise, go make some money of them.