Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)KN
Posts
10
Comments
691
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • They're being pragmatic, they actually want to get paid, and they don't want the US to have to pay for all of these weapons and other material. Not everyone you disagree with is a Russian asset, no matter how hard that narrative is pushed.

    All of the "aid" the US has sent to Ukraine has been on credit, a 21st Century lend-lease. The original 20th century lend-lease was a roaring success in terms of subjugating the British empire, and it's also worth noting that a lot of US representatives of that era were very hesitant to approve the "care packages" in the first place as well. The debt Britain owes the US from WWII has actually never been repaid, but the US got global hegemony out of the deal so they agreed to look the other way.

    Ukraine however has no ability to pay off the debt they have already racked up, let alone more. Not just because they've lost militarily but also because anything remotely productive in the country (primary farmland and factories) has been parceled off to the highest (US based) bidder, destroyed via the war, or can't be productive in the foreseeable due to the loss of working people to emigration and war.

  • I'm not sure I'd say it's the same. The US bails out the revered private corporation. Moodys is one hundred percent on board with that.

    With SOEs and governments there's no major shareholders who stand to win, so there's no reason for a bailout by their logic.

  • They're measuring installed capacity, not actually generated power. Given the very low output vs theoretical maximum capacity of renewables this translates to something closer to 15% generated power, including hydroelectric.

  • Even if it's as simple as choosing which Root CA's we want to trust, how many people will know to do that and be able to do that? A couple percent at most.

    Of course we need full ownership of our devices, and trusted computing has always referred to the trust of for-profit corporations, but this in itself doesn't help the vast majority of people who either don't know that they're compromised, think they have nothing to hide, are unable to do anything about it, or a mix of all three.

    Privacy and security are already a privilege. Proposals like eIDAS only make it even more unaccessible.