kn33 @ kn33 @lemmy.world

Posts

3

Comments

607

Joined

2 yr. ago

I hope they use unique, random passwords for each device this time. Not that I'm rooting for Corrections, but this is educational time that's being lost

Very Very Verbose

Alright, that's it. This person needs war crimes done to them.

I was at work and already in hot water for not spending enough time working. Also, it's a shitpost.

Edit: I got fired

Appropriate username

It evacuates the waste before it's waste

It's very good

Idk but I wouldn't risk it when it's easy to encrypt stuff. Good security is done in layers.

What about a torrent? You'll have to encrypt with 7zip or something to keep it secure, but that and qbitorrent will do the trick.

But what if he poked them? That'd hurt, man. Can't take the risk.

2 laptops - 1 personal, 1 for work. 4 monitors - 2 for each laptop

What does this statement mean then? Why would you pirate something if you had no interest in it? If it's interesting enough to download, it must have been worth something to you.

Sure. But it doesn't mean it's worth the asking price to me. Because I can't negotiate on that price, my interest is effectively worth nothing to the company.

Let's pretend for a minute that piracy wasn't an option. In that scenario, I simply wouldn't watch it. Therefore, there's no potential that the company will get money from me, and there's no opportunity for them to get money. Because there's no opportunity, there's no opportunity cost for the company to me pirating the content.

That's what people are talking about when they talk about the company losing money to piracy. They're talking about the unrealized potential income of people that would have paid for the content, but didn't because they pirated it instead. The counterpoint to that is that there's no way I'm going to pay for it. Therefore, there's no unrealized potential income. They're not out of anything by me pirating their company.

At this point I think we're actually just beating a pot of glue

I want an LLM integration for my work's ticketing system so that I don't have to read the notes, I can just get a summary and ask questions about it as needed.

doesn't allow you to do anything you can't do without it.

That's false. It allows you to not need a password to unlock the volume at boot.

Im really confused why people think TPM needs to be involved in anyway when using LUKS.

Because it's convenient

The disk will be decrypted on boot, but then they'll have to contend with needing a password to log in

I explained this in another thread. They're ending sale of perpetual license. They're not breaking ones they've already sold. That being said, eventually the version that perpetual licenses were sold for will stop getting updates and they'll become a security risk. That was always the lifecycle for perpetual licenses, though.

Representing himself

You won't be able to upgrade to new versions when the support contract runs out, but you can install updates to the existing version as long as updates are made for it. This has always been the lifecycle for perpetual licensing. It's good forever, but at a certain point it becomes a security risk to continue using. The difference here is they won't sell you another perpetual license when the lifecycle is up.