kixik @ kixik @lemmy.ml

Posts

72

Comments

281

Joined

4 yr. ago

It looks like, though OTB (opentype bitmap fonts) are different than plain bitmap fonts, and are actually supported by pango. Alacritty allows me to use Terminus OTB fonts for example. There are other true type fonts which are also sort of my plan B, which are not supported by kitty either, as mentioned, I wanted to see if there's a way not just to select between the list kitty offers, which is sort of limited. At any rate if not Terminus, I don't really like much my plan B true type fonts much...

For those kitty users, have anyone been able to use fonts not in the list kitty support? I only use Terminus (OTB) fonts on terminal, and when trying kitty out, I found no way to get it to use Terminus (I could only select between those supported by kitty).

Alacritty (with screen if I need a multiplexor)

f-droid -> expert mode -> privileged extension (turned on)

But you need to install f-droid with privileged extension, which is easy on LOS and derivatives/forks, but not sure on things like grapheneOS/calyxOS/pure android...

Thanks !

which one is it? The replies were erased, :(

Jami with unifiedPush notifications is a pretty good option

Wofi is still working fine with wayfire. It's actually still offered on Arch as part of the "extra" repository:

    
% pacman -Ss wofi
extra/wofi 1.3-2 [installed]
    launcher for wlroots-based wayland compositors

  

To be honest, I found it more straight forward than rofi, but I could still use rofi if it worked well on wayland. I've never used tofi, and it doesn't seem like a drop-in replacement for wofi. But I guess it's worth trying. It's seems less graphical than wofi though...

These two posts are really enlightening:

How I Built My New Linux Gaming Desktop In 2021 With Amd Cpugpu And Gnu Guix

I Love Arch But Gnu Guix Is My New Distro

From the last, there is a non guix project including packages for guix, which are not officially supported given hey are not free software. I recommend taking a look at the last post at least, since it comes from someone who used Arch, and made the move to Guix, not just opinions from people like me, who haven't ever used Guix.

That said, Guix is in my TODO list. The thing is that I want to learn a bit more than minimal Guile, so I can write packages myself (there are always missing packages, even on Arch/Artix + AUR, I always have the need to whether tweak something at some point, or create a package still not in there), and also deal with my own services to run with shepherd. So I don't want to blindly try things out...

It shares with Nix the reproducible build of everything, but the language it uses is Guile, which has some history. Nix has its own language. To me that's a plus on Guix. But the most important part, is that the official repos are all for free software, and then on the non guix project one can look for non free software pieces, which to me this is also a plus. I guest most might differ.

But again, if you want to try it, even if it's just because of curiosity, why not doing it so? I hope those prior posts from someone who migrated there might be helpful.

Why not looking for distributed mechanism, which don't depend on trusting central servers or particular instances on decentralized mechanisms, like jami, or similar?

Pff, I just got logged out on a refresh, hehe. So what I said is not true, I'm getting logged out, somehow randomly (can't say I know under which conditions that happens). Not sure if there was a release candidate upgrade, since I can't remember the version before this new logout. Currently:

    
UI: 0.19.0-rc.11
BE: 0.19.0-rc.10

  

Nope, I only have a lemmy.ml account, and I only use librewolf on the desktop...

I had that issue of having to re-login, and then every now and then when I do reload, it posts not on my subscribed communities as if I were not logged in, although I'm logged in, but on a subsequent reload, then only my subscribed communities posts show up. I haven't had to re-login again, just after the upgrade, and then the other minor annoyance is that, but a subsequent reload is enough...

Thanks !

Is it normal that on an upgrade, users are forced to re-login?

I don't think so. Dhcpcd + wpa_supplicant is really light, suitable for light installers, and live USB stick images.

I've been using dhcpcd + wpa_supplicant for so long... I do understand currently users prefer NM, but I hope there's no push for it to be the unique way to manage network connectivity, and on light installers, I hope I'm not force to use NM either.

very few, and one has to try so many times... I gave up. I guess RSS feeds whenever possible. though that consumes disk if local, so I'm really reluctant...

That has never been true, not at the point of the discussions on Debian (on Arch there was never a public discussion that I remember), and of of course not true now.

s6, dinit, runit, openrc and shephered are good options, currently in use by different distros. At the time of the public debian descussions, at least runit and openrc were available, but they were dismissed, and I don't remember the arguments, but not so convincing at the time, thus the whole discussion about the topic.

I'm not a systemd opponent, but claims of not having compelling alternatives doesn't feel right. I used Arch with systemd for a while, and I moved later to Artix with s6, and I'm thinking on testing dinit, and I have no issue. I guess if some major distros had made the move to runit or openrc, they would be more used as of now. BTW, at work, for containers and VMs I actually need to use systemd, and I see no problem with that.

It's totally true sysVinit was way hard to keep maintaining on distros, and something else was required. Probably given the influence from major distros changed the game over systemd, and now that's considered standardization now a days, but something else could also have become the standard. What's for sure is that there are success stories of using something else, Guix with shepherd, Artix with several inits (dinit, s6, runit, openrc), Gentoo with openrc (one can choose others, like systemd), void with runit, chimera with dinit, and the list goes on. Variety is not necessarily a luxury, in this case it means one can choose whatever aligns better to one's needs, believes (perhaps simplicity, perhaps minimalism, perhaps free/libre considerations, etc), and so on.

What's also true is that for work purposes, one can't be negligent learning about systemd, most probably one will need to deal with it sooner or later, because major distros, and in particular commercial ones, already embraced systemd, and that's not changing any time soon.

The sad effect of wide adoption of systemd, whether one opposes it or not, is that now services/daemons developers focus on providing systemd ready daemons, and for anything else the distro developers need to port to non systemd alternatives, and even build applications without systemd if that's possible at all. And if one is looking for a daemon not packaged by the non systemd distro of choice, ones is on our own creating the proper service/daemon, but not something impossible.

The main problem with systemd has never been the time it takes to boot, it's more on the lines of what @z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml and @StrangeAstronomer@lemmy.ml mentioned.

true !

Well, there are alternatives. There's /e/ (murena.io now a days) and distroot, and you can use gnupg with others who also use gnupg, and with distroot you can use its own encryption as well. There's tutanota and prrotonmail, which use their own encryption mechanisms but only work with the same providers and not with other providers...

I mean there are already several non big corps providers of email. Distroot also provides xmpp, nextcloud, and several other services, the same as /e/. I can't tell I'd trust more TB than the alternatives, several of them are non profit. But there are options. It's sad before smart phones, some big corps were already dominating the services, and after them, things got even worse. But there have been, and still are, options for refugees. That's not the issue in my mind.

The big issue, is that those big corps do what they want, excluding those not using them. All of them, no exception, place received messages from /e/ to the spam, that if the email even reaches the final user, some times it gets discarded by the service without even getting to the end receiver. Several mail registrations for whatever account, banks, insurance, stores and so on, don't even accept email addresses if not from the big corps. So the huge and toxic influence from big corps doesn't get corrected by another non big corp service. It's like with FLOSS alternatives, or more private alternatives in general, the issue is the power most users give to those big corps. Most users prefer those corps services, at times ignoring the non big corps are not less comfortable, but most of the time they don't even care, even if told there are easy enough alternative they would still select big corps. Then with such power, big corps not only dominate, but also discriminate non big corps users...