kitonthenet @ kitonthenet @kbin.social

Posts

0

Comments

450

Joined

2 yr. ago

Yeah the UK is also a member of five eyes, it could be the us, uk, Australia or New Zealand

for the health of US-Canada relations that unnamed ally better be the US

Then why the hell are the rest of us even trying?

thanks for getting wise to the politics of the republican party since 2010 kev!

he's shittin hims pants

for those that don't know: https://www.poder360.com.br/governo/campanha-de-bolsonaro-paga-anuncios-para-negar-pedofilia/

Ok, so I can come change your locks then

Linux gaming

Windows 11 desktop

Is there device support for Linux?

To exfiltrate the login password from a keylogger on a macbook, for example, you need to have some software running on the cpu as well as the keyboard itself. This makes it very difficult to do in reality, as you have to infect both devices and if you do not have physical access, your exploit needs to be done across the keyboard interface, which makes it very hard to do in practice. Swapping any random keyboard in that could potentially be malicious introduces two issues, as now the keyboard itself may have a keylogger, as well as opening the possibility of exploiting some vulnerability in the cpu from the keyboard itself. You therefore open two attack surfaces that were previously closed, which is highly significant.

people have different levels of risk acceptance and that’s ok

Except it is the editorial agenda of ifixit to promote legislation that requires this lesser level of security, which makes it not ok. Outlawing verification in software requires all devices to have the same vulnerability at the interface, it would even affect users who want to buy OEM.

I’m not saying it has to be absurd, but no one is acknowledging that the security risks are real, and requiring a lesser standard of security is a cost of legislating this stuff, which it is the editorial stance of ifixit to support

It absolutely could, if the processor trusts that the data coming from the faceid sensor is accurate, the faceid sensor can simply lie. You’re removing a layer of defense, which necessarily impacts security

So then you’ll let me change the locks on your front door to one I choose?

No, give me the argument that you can secure these interfaces, some of which provide biometric security, without verifying vendor origin in software

often are genuine, but Apple makes features not work unless paired

Because unless you pair the screen, the device has no way to know it’s genuine. If it’s not, it could implement any number of attacks, including keyloggers, screen stealers, etc

don’t believe

Why shouldn’t I? No one has given an argument that you can actually secure these peripherals without software locks, I bought my iPhone and MacBook because they offer security, even when I run Linux on it my MacBook has far superior boot security (the only thing apple has engineering control over in that use case) than any intel machines I’ve used

Also lol that article, you know the difference between one incident and a pervasive effort to mine your privacy for profit

Mfs out here want to install their bootleg faceid in my phone at their sketchy self repair place so they can sell my data and break its security. Let’s not pretend ifixit isn’t the exact same rent seeking that apple is, they just want to be the middle man

There’s a lot of countries with belligerent neighbors who so far have not developed a nuclear program watching what kind of help Ukraine gets and for how long very, very closely

It doesn’t hurt that the same companies that did all the things that made people cynical about technologies are the ones perpetrating this round of BS