kibiz0r @ kibiz0r @midwest.social

Posts

2

Comments

1,507

Joined

2 yr. ago

“What’s penetrating gaze?”

“Not much, what’s penetrating you?”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_zombie

A philosophical zombie (or "p-zombie") is a being in a thought experiment in the philosophy of mind that is physically identical to a normal human being but does not have conscious experience.

If we’re talking about atom-by-atom reconstruction, then the question is about philosophical zombies.

I don’t put much stock in any philosophies that say you the constructed being definitely would be a zombie. But I do believe in the possibility that you the constructed being could be a zombie.

Deterministic atheism isn’t at odds with a soul or non-physicalism. See: Walden Pod

Beware the Integrated Drive Electronics of March June

His name is Mike

See also: Do artifacts have politics?

Pardons apply to criminal contempt but not civil contempt. What could happen is that the executive branch could refuse to carry out the contempt order. If that happens, it’s basically game over.

Square root of negative one

So, it’s toxic to our brains, our communication channels, our privacy, our economy, our artistic pursuits, our education system, our basic dignity as people… remind me why we’re so excited to make this fucking thing as quickly and recklessly as possible?

I don’t think blahaj would object to the basic message.

There are the occasional man-hating users, sure. But for the most part, the instance seems to accept the idea that men suffer under patriarchy as well.

Now, when you bring it up in response to women, enbies, etc. suffering under patriarchy… that’s not so great.

So I guess it depends on what community it would be posted to, and how it would be posted.

Given how OP seems to be spamming this in multiple unrelated communities… I can’t imagine they would post it to blahaj tactfully. So… maybe you’re right, lol.

Bechdel salt

Holesome

Life is an orderly system of producing disorder

All of security is about trade-offs. “What does it protect me from, and what do I give up to gain that protection?”

If you need to remember a lot of passwords, then having some kind of system makes sense.

But most people don’t need to remember a lot of passwords. Most people can reasonably offload that job to a password manager.

So without knowing anything more, I’d guess it’s not good security for them.

TESCREAL

It ends in either replacing humans with AGI or massive atrocities in an attempt to achieve it.

And there are people in positions of real power who believe in this stuff and act on it.

Andreessen posted a manifesto where he said that deliberately delaying AGI is basically mass murder and should be treated as such.

The posts will continue until reality improves.

How about robots that heal people?

Quoted as saying “Whatever, I’ll buy a new one.”

🎤 Get it up, hold it in, let me begin…