Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)KR
Posts
2
Comments
148
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Yeah, this is pretty much my take.

    The web sites that are interested in this tool never wanted to be actual web sites. They wanted to be closed client-server systems with proprietary, opaque protocols… HTTP was just a convenient implementation to leverage.

    What WEI does is basically allow all of these wanna-be walled gardens to become actual walled gardens.

    They never wanted to be interoperable in the first place, so what are we losing? Good riddance.

    Maybe with this in place, we’ll be able to start rebuilding the interoperable web that we had before VC money took it over.

    We just need a compelling business model for it. “Free” ad-supported is toxic for open discourse, and now it’s functionally deprecated on the open web. I think that’s a good thing, but good changes are not necessarily easy to endure.

    I’m not sure how we’ll do it. Attention tokens and all that crypto stuff seems like garbage, but having a thousand different subscriptions to get past paywalls is not great either.

  • Thank you for contacting technical support.

    It appears you’re having a problem with HUMOR.EXE.

    You seem to have enabled LIP (Laughter Integrity Protection) Service.

    You should know that LIP Service does not apply to built-in protocols such as TAB/00, and will cause compatibility issues in certain deployment environments such as EARTH.ENV.

    To solve your particular issue, you’ll want to navigate to the /ASS directory, right-click on HEAD.ZIP and select “Extract”.

  • Capitalism is a tool. Being pro-capitalism is like being pro-circular saw.

    What you see as “anti-capitalism” is people pointing out that using one tool for everything is, at best, inefficient… and, at worst, dangerous.

    Insisting that everything must be quantifiable and min/maxed according to market demands is nonsense, and hurts people.

    There are things we value which are not profitable. There are things that are profitable but not valuable.

  • ChatGPT is an incompetent, unethical mess, and the rare occasions where its stochastic output aligns with reality, it is abusing the generosity of people who expected to be licensing their work to fellow human creatives and not the inanimate avatar of cognitive oblivion.

  • Wrong community, so I did have to down-doot… but I also dig your post.

    Their philosophies are pretty much a way to morally and/or pseudo-scientifically ret-con the heinous, antisocial, extractive shit they were already gonna do anyway.

    “I need the money in order to decide the path of the world, and I deserve to be the one who decides because I’m the one who managed to get the money.” There’s no room for democracy in their world view.

  • Step forward: we hear

    That you are a good man.

    You cannot be bought, but the lightning

    Which strikes the house, also

    Cannot be bought.

    You hold to what you said.

    But what did you say?

    You are honest, you say your opinion.

    Which opinion?

    You are brave.

    Against whom?

    You are wise.

    For whom?

    You do not consider your personal advantages.

    Whose advantages do you consider then?

    You are a good friend.

    Are you also a good friend of the good people?

    Hear us then: we know.

    You are our enemy. This is why we shall

    Now put you in front of a wall. But in consideration of your merits and good qualities

    We shall put you in front of a good wall and shoot you

    With a good bullet from a good gun and bury you

    With a good shovel in the good earth.

  • Am I the only one that gets a nails-on-chalkboard feeling from “how it looks like”?

    It’s either “what it looks like”, or “how it looks”. Not some amalgamation of both.

  • I mean, it’s Google. What did you expect? Android is free because having it on a ton of cheap phones helps Google collect data and sell ads.

    Side-rant:

    Apple’s got plenty of problems and anti-consumer behavior, too, don’t get me wrong… but it’s incredible how far they’re able to enforce privacy, down to the hardware level, while still giving devs almost the same level of control over OS features as Android.

    Like, look at how ARKit does point cloud sharing vs ARCore. iOS limits sharing scanned AR environments to peer-to-peer local connections, and it’s a totally opaque object. Android meanwhile uploads your scanned room to a Google server, and the privacy terms for that data are the same as the ones for Youtube, search, maps, etc.

    It drives me crazy how many FOSS nerds will rail against Facebook’s data collection and chokepoint capitalism, but then go on to praise Android for standing up to that no-good Apple. They hear “I can sideload apps” and they drop all of their recent cynicism about why they’re getting nifty stuff at a hefty discount.

  • Looks like that's based on an outdated TOS. Even then, those terms are pretty tame except for the one about transferable license for uploaded content, which has thankfully been narrowed by a lot in the current TOS. (Now it just means: We're allowed to store your images on S3, resize them, and show them to people you specifically selected to send them to.)

    For a company that's worried about 230 safe harbor, GDPR, CCPA, and wants to promote their first-party products at you, this is all standard.

    Also:

    This service does not sell your personal data