Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)KA
Posts
1
Comments
108
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Sorry, I'm still watching the opening sequence of motion picture, I'll let you know what I think when it's done.

    /snark

    But for real, I feel like the last season of Picard was finally a chance to see the TNG TV characters in action in a TNG movie.

  • Given the psychological effect of owning a gun, or having access to one has on a person, I honestly feel like we're in the same mental health territory as any behavioral antagonist, like leaving an addictive substance around an addict. You take a gun and put everything it means in a person's hands - the power, the mythology, the kind of baggage it comes with in this country - and it's gonna have some kind of effect.

    I don't know about you, but I've witnessed, and am aware of many cases where drivers of certain kinds of cars - big, fast, whatever - do stupid, reckless, dangerous, even murderous things because of the feeling of power and control their vehicle gives them. It's the psychology of the damn things that makes people crazy.

    We have a phrase for it, oddly enough: "it's like leaving a loaded gun on the table"

  • It's funny, I had to reread op's comment a couple times before I realized (I think) that they aren't making the usual argument against voting - I'm so conditioned to expect it because the usual centrist/progressive discourse is black and whited to "vote" vs "don't vote." We get it from the media, bad actors, wishy-washy liberal-liberals, and... (Sigh) leftists who don't know any better.

    "Vote, and" should be the message - vote and organize, vote and run for office, whatever. To your point, we need to at least keep a thumb on the gushing artery if we plan to survive.

  • I read it as a post apocalyptic story, but I think mcarthy described it as a near future, non specific "ecological catastrophe," which retrospectively recolored the story for me - tipped it from "The Walking Dead, except people" to "cautionary/exploratory speculative fiction on human survival in the face of collapse," for me

  • I call this my "rule of three" - I wait until I've seen "something" three times before deciding on an abstraction. Two isn't enough to get an idea of all the potential angles, and if you don't touch it a third time, it's probably not important enough to warrant the effort and risk of a refactor