karlhungus @ karlhungus @lemmy.ca

Posts

0

Comments

137

Joined

2 yr. ago

I agree, EV's aren't a complete climate solution. Do car company's or trump need more capitulation though? Haven't they gotten enough.

We got jack and shit, and jack left town (ref).

we can dream!

Maybe he is, maybe he isn't

WHAT. He sold beans for money in his first term, of course he's making money off of it.

I don't think he's smart enough to actually take advantage of this.

This is one of his major MO's making money, maybe he missed the first few times, but he's done it so much now that he's for sure making money on these bets, just like every supporter he's got out there.

Why do you think he walked away from the table because of the DST, because he cares about gig tech? They paid him -- that's why they got seats at his inauguration.

And before you say anything, no he will not learn his lesson.

Disagree, this is a lesson reinforces itself, I bet he continues this way. I'm not saying he's smart, just greedy.

I guess we'll find out in time, but that's sort of my point. Trump's well known to fold (TACO), maybe he would have shown up to the table anyway, or written us a letter!

What did we get, cause it sure does seem like nothing.

I liked Jagmeet, and the NDP platform (well what i understood of it), if i wasn't worried that PP would get in they would have gotten my vote. I did feel that he didn't stand a chance of getting in.

I did read Carney's book (values), i found it extremely difficult to read, and said a lot without saying anything. I don't think he would get my vote if not for PP.

I'd like to see a rule that any politician voted in must work in an aid camp in a warzone to be elegable for office. Or maybe spend a year as an average citizen in their country.

I think people didn't vote for Carny as much as against PP. It's a bit sad that he is following the old playbook.

I hear you, and i agree. I don't understand how to achieve it though, a tax on net worth, with brackets starting at 100 million? Wouldn't they just move their money over a place that would hide it?

The percentage seemed arbitrary and it being retroactive seemed excessive and unnecessary.

What?! 3% We pay 8.79% on our income here. Three seems low.

I feel like no facebook in canada would be a net positive, especially after reading "Carless people". I don't even think that would happen, it's not like these companies can't afford it, they just don't want to set a precedent, and they spent all that money on trump!

I use an adblocker and pirate most my stuff so no one is making money off me.

You never use Amazon? I also use an adblocker and a pihole i think i see relatively fewer ads, i still see them.

The one negative i can think of coming out of this is the companies passing the tax on to us, i suspect that wouldn't happen.

the parent of this thread thinks it's stupid, and got up voted but like zero explanation. Looking at their post history they don't seem like a bot

I don't get the hate, it seems like about time these ultra rich companies paid some taxes?

Why is dst stupid?

Go has an idiom like so https://github.com/hashicorp/vault/blob/8da4386caceb3fdfaa90074bb29c77e8a99c7dad/api/kv_test.go#L27, when i mention name i'm referring to that string.

I get what your saying, we've all worked in terrible code bases, i've also worked in code bases where this kind of article was enforced. What you wound up with was something that was very wordy.

Almost always use parameterized style tests, always have a name field, I don't use full sentences tho, that seems like too much. Don't believe I've ever seen a test like that either

These toy examples feel like strawmen to me

This is incorrect.

You should read a summary of "capital in the twentieth century" , a famous book by an economist that asserts mathematically that taxation of the wealthy is the solution for this issue.

"Also tarrifs are a leftist thing"

This kind of talk helps no one, and asserts something that is practically unassertable. Even if we could split the world evenly in two between left and right and at some point the left were the first to propose tarrifs there'd be so little relation to today as to be useless

For this kind of thing i usually go by popularity (active repo/popular repo), mostly to have the most other people in your boat. It doesn't always work but generally if other users have to migrate at least you can ask them questions.

On the face of it i'd go with the csi driver version, only because we use alternative csi drivers ourselves, and haven't seen any issues (ours are pretty aws vanella though).

We use storage classes (for our drivers) the "dynamic provisioning" section of https://juicefs.com/docs/csi/guide/pv, you'll need to make one of those, then create a statefulset and mount the pv in there.

I do find statefulsets to be a bit of a not as well supported part of kubernetes, but generally they work well enough.

I guess i shouldn't have answered, I do have experience with multiple storage-classes, but none of the classes you mention (so like i don't really know anything about them). I envisioned you dealing with pod level storage issues and thought that'd be something most programs would have lots of difficulty dealing with, where as a more service oriented approach would expect remote failures (hence the recommendation).

All of the things you mentioned don't seem like they have provisioners, so maybe you mean your individual nodes would have these associated remote fs'. At that point i don't think kubelet cares, you just mount those on the machines and tell kubelet about it via host mount

Oh shit look there's a CSI driver for juicefs https://juicefs.com/docs/csi/introduction/, they kinda start out recommending the host mount https://juicefs.com/docs/cloud/use_juicefs_in_kubernetes/.

We make some use of PV's but people i find my team often tend to avoid them.

I probably should have shut my mouth from the start!

My gut says go multi cluster (or not) at that pointbut treat the remote as a service, have a local container be a proxy

Thank you! This is like the one thing it should have had