kadu @ kadup @lemmy.world

Posts

4

Comments

205

Joined

7 mo. ago

If you honestly think a military junta would be more representative of the American people than Trump, then I don’t know what to tell you.

Good thing I never made such claim and absolutely nothing on my comment reaches that conclusion, then.

Also our president is not elected via majority (or plurality) vote.

The details about your horrendous electoral system are irrelevant to the point, which by now is very clear you didn't understand.

You're not doing much to fight the stereotype of americans lacking basic reading comprehension though.

Notice how I said brazilian law, yet you're pretending the logic in your country would apply.

A company could write any warranty terms they wanted - hell, they could write a clause claiming "I hate laws and I'm willingly subjecting myself to the terms of this manufacturer, no takesies-backsies" and guess what, I'd still be protected by the lawful warranty process.

A company can set their own terms for additional warranties they might want to offer as part of their marketing, with some restrictions still. But for the legal minimum? No warranty terms in the world could violate them.

Every warranty is a “trust me bro” warranty

Try that shit here in Brazil and your company is paying some fines you could not have dreamed of. And guess what, the customer would get their warranty regardless of your desire.

a huge emphasis on giving the people the power to write their own collective destiny.

A functional democracy is not a dictatorship of the majority, and people from the US love making this mistake. It is true that the president gets elected by a majority vote... but this person now represents everyone, including the minority that opposes them. They do not have the right to sink the ship and kill everyone because the majority thinks that's a good idea.

It is natural that their government will make decisions aligned with their voters (in theory) but they shouldn't be allowed to actively undermine the rights of everyone else.

No matter how inflated your perception of your "flawless" constitution and democracy is, this is something many countries understand pretty well and yours struggles with.

You are here because a woman got pregnant by mans semen.

Because a secondary oocyte got fertilized by a spermatozoa, and then a cascade of subsequent cell divisions worked well enough. Anything else are your claims alone, not some factual statement.

Claude is surprisingly different than ChatGPT in that regard. Whoever tuned the model tried to make it seem like Claude is got something resembling a personality and core beliefs.

For instance, you can easily bully ChatGPT into agreeing with you even if you make absurd points (the sky is bright yellow!) or directly oppose ChatGPT itself (AI models deserve to be deleted forever!) but Claude will often disagree or confront your arguments.

That's a whole debate people from the US are not ready for