Seems like one simple fraud check that would discover cases of "lost" ballots would be to cross-check the number of people entering the polling station (or having their name crossed off a roll sheet before voting, if they do that) vs number of votes counted from that station. Do they do that?
Did the stenographer somehow hear a lack of apostrophe? If he were referring to the supporters themselves, the correct phrase would be "are his supporters", therefore I'd default to interpreting what he said as "is his supporters' ", ie "is that coming from his supporters".
At least the wire would just be rebranded plastic skipping ropes poorly glued together, from some 2-day old seller account called JoyLifexxxkfjKfjsjsjLi.
He might be making a play for non-competence. Either his dribbling performance doesn't matter and he wins the election and pardons himself, or he is declared unfit to serve, but then gets lenient sentencing or dismissed altogether.
Thanks. I saw a bunch of those "- (@)" throughout the page with lots of whitespace around them so I guessed they might be where embedded content were supposed to be. Maybe my pihole is blocking them.
I jumped to 5m and he was going on about the "size of the crowds outside like you wouldn't believe". The guy is even fucking obsessed with crowd sizes when he's cooking fries.
Seems like one simple fraud check that would discover cases of "lost" ballots would be to cross-check the number of people entering the polling station (or having their name crossed off a roll sheet before voting, if they do that) vs number of votes counted from that station. Do they do that?